ArticleScientific reports2024
Erosion behavior of Al-SiC and Al-WC MMCs via powder metallurgy under solid particle impingement.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact Angle-Velocity Interactions Governing Solid-Particle Erosion in Laser Powder Bed Fused AlSi10Mg.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Optimal selection of SiC and TiOScientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the erosion behavior of Al-SiC and Al-WC metal-based composites in a solid particle impingement environment developed through powder metallurgy. Micro-sized powders of SiC and WC were utilized in different weight proportions (0-10 wt%) for fabricating the composite samples. The angle of impingements of 30-90° and impact velocity of 30-90 m/s were used for solid particle erosion testing. Microstructure was characterized by XRD, SEM, and EDS. The results of the ANOVA test indicate that impact velocity is the most significant factor, followed by reinforcement content. SiC composite with reinforcement content of 2.5 and 5 wt% showed ductile erosion behavior at lower angles of impingements and brittle behavior at higher angles of impingements. On the other hand, 10 wt% of SiC indicated a semi-ductile erosion behavior. The reinforcement content is 5 and 10 wt % of WC showed a semi-ductile erosion behavior, whereas 2.5 wt% of WC showed a mix of ductile and brittle behavior. At a 30° angle of impingement, SiC (10 wt%) provides the best erosion performance, whereas, at 90° (i.e., at normal), WC (10 wt%) performs better than all other composites. SiC (5 wt %) comes out to be the best performer at 45° of the angle of impingement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.