Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39604378›Full record

Observational studyNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2024

Use and acceptability of an asthma diagnosis clinical decision support system for primary care clinicians: an observational mixed methods study.

Luke Daines, Anne Canny, Eddie Donaghy, Victoria Murray, Leo Campbell, Carol Stonham, Heather Milne, David Price, Mark Buchner, Lesley Nelson and 5 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Luke DainesAsthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. luke.daines@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0564-4000
Anne CannyAsthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1156-383X
Eddie DonaghyAsthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7383-0107
Victoria MurrayAsthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Leo CampbellAsthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Carol StonhamNHS Gloucestershire Integrated Care Board, Gloucester, UK.
Heather MilneSouth East GP Unit, NHS Education for Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
David PriceObservational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9728-9992
Mark BuchnerTactuum, 280 St Vincent Street, Glasgow, UK.
Lesley NelsonTactuum, 280 St Vincent Street, Glasgow, UK.
Frances S MairGeneral Practice and Primary Care, School of Health and Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9780-1135
Aziz SheikhAsthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7022-3056
Andrew BushImperial Centre for Paediatrics and Child Health and National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6756-9822
Brian McKinstryCentre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9581-0468
Hilary PinnockAsthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5976-8386

Funding

Asthma and Lung UK,United Kingdom AUK-PG-2018-404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is uncertainty about how best to diagnose asthma, especially in primary care where mis-diagnosis is common. To address this, we developed a clinical decision support system (CDSS) for asthma diagnosis in children and young people (aged 5-25 years). This study explored the feasibility and acceptability of the CDSS in UK primary care. We recruited general practices from England and Scotland. The CDSS was available for use during routine consultations for six months. We analysed CDSS usage and, toward the end of the study, undertook qualitative interviews with clinicians who had used the CDSS. Within the 10 practices who completed the study, the CDSS was used by 75 out of 94 clinicians. 11 clinicians from 8 practices were interviewed. The CDSS was acceptable to participants who particularly commented on the ease of use and auto-population of information from the patient record. Barriers to use included the inability to record findings directly into the patient notes and a sense that, whilst possibly useful for trainees and junior colleagues, the CDSS would not necessarily lead to a change in their own practice. The CDSS was generally well received by primary care clinicians, though participants felt it would be most useful for trainees and less experienced colleagues.

Indexed as

AsthmaDecision Support Systems, ClinicalAdolescentAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelChildChild, PreschoolEnglandFemaleHumansMalePrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchScotlandYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39604378
PMCPMC11603350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.