ArticleJournal of cosmetic dermatology2025
Assessment of Clients' Perceptions and Satisfaction With Eyebrow Mesotherapy Treatment.
Article in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEyebrows significantly influence facial aesthetics and are often linked to attractiveness and personality. Eyebrow loss and alopecia impact physical and psychological well-being. Several treatments, including mesotherapy (MT), aim to enhance eyebrow density and quality. Despite the availability of MT for hair growth, its application in eyebrow revitalization is less explored.
aimsThis study evaluates clients' perceptions and satisfaction with eyebrow MT (EB MT) using AQ skin solutions' growth factor-based MT cocktail serum. PATIENTS/
methodsThirty-two healthy women (ages 21-55) with thin or weakened eyebrows underwent three EB MT sessions spaced 2-4 weeks apart. Exclusion criteria included chronic diseases, allergies, and conditions like pregnancy. Each session lasted about 40 min, and "point by point" and "nappage" techniques were employed. Satisfaction and pain levels were assessed through a Numeric Rating Scale for Satisfaction (NRSS) and Pain scale, while photographic analysis and the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) evaluated effectiveness.
resultsThe average GAIS score was 8.28, while the NRSS satisfaction score was 8.06. Pain levels were moderately low, averaging 4.0. A high majority (90.6%) were satisfied and willing to continue treatment, with 100% recommending EB MT to others. Notable improvements in overall appearance were reported by participants.
conclusionsEB MT demonstrated high satisfaction and low pain levels, with significant improvements in eyebrow density and appearance. This treatment is a practical option for eyebrow enhancement with a strong safety profile, motivating further clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.