Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39604183›Full record

ReviewEuropean burn journal2022

Infection and Burn Injury.

Edward J Kelly, Mary A Oliver, Bonnie C Carney, Jeffrey W Shupp

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European burn journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Burn Selection: How Fire Injury Shaped Human Evolution.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Epidemiology and timing of infectious complications from battlefield-related burn injuries.Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries · 2024
    Article
  15. Multidrug-Resistant Organisms: The Silent Plight of Burn Patients.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Isotonic medium treatment limits burn wound microbial colonisation and improves tissue repair.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Edward J KellyFirefighters' Burn and Surgical Research Laboratory, MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Mary A OliverFirefighters' Burn and Surgical Research Laboratory, MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Bonnie C CarneyFirefighters' Burn and Surgical Research Laboratory, MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Jeffrey W ShuppFirefighters' Burn and Surgical Research Laboratory, MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, DC 20010, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burn injury is debilitating and among one of the most frequently occurring traumas. Critical care improvements have allowed for increasingly positive outcomes. However, infection, whether it be localized to the site of the wound or systemic in nature, remains a serious cause of morbidity and mortality. Immune suppression predisposes the burn population to the development of invasive infections; and this along with the possibility of inhalation injury puts them at a significant risk for mortality. Emerging multi-drug-resistant pathogens, including

Indexed as

burnCAUTIsCLABSIsHAIinfectionMDROMRSAsepsistrauma

Identifiers

PMID39604183
PMCPMC11575387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.