Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39604180›Full record

ArticleEuropean burn journal2022

Pre-Burn Health-Related Quality of Life: Patient and Partner Perspectives.

Elise Boersma-van Dam, Helma W C Hofland, Alette E E de Jong, Nancy E E Van Loey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European burn journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elise Boersma-van DamAssociation of Dutch Burn Centres, 1941 AJ Beverwijk, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4448-4812
Helma W C HoflandAssociation of Dutch Burn Centres, Maasstad Hospital, 3079 DZ Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Alette E E de JongRed Cross Hospital, 1942 LE Beverwijk, The Netherlands.
Nancy E E Van LoeyDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

Nederlandse Brandwonden Stichting 12.105Nederlandse Brandwonden Stichting 17.102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A proxy-assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQL) may be an alternative for burn patients who are medically unable to self-report shortly after being admitted to the hospital. This study examined the patient-partner agreement on the recalled pre-injury HRQL of burn patients. In a multi-centre study of 117 patient-partner pairs, the recalled pre-burn HRQL was assessed with the EQ-5D-3L + Cognition during the acute phase following the burns. Agreement was evaluated with Kappa and ICC statistics. Burn severity and PTSD symptoms were assessed as potential predictors of disagreement. The results showed that pre-burn EQ-Index scores were similar to population norms, whereas the EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS) scores of patients were significantly higher. Agreement varied across EQ-5D domains and, after adjusting for prevalence, was substantial to almost perfect. Average agreement on the EQ-Index and EQ-VAS was, respectively, substantial and moderate, but differences between partners were larger at lower levels of HRQL, and specifically in the pain/discomfort domain. Patient-partner differences could not be explained by the patient's age or gender, number of surgeries, partner's presence at the burn event, or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms of either the patient or partner. In conclusion, patient-partner agreement is substantial and partner-proxy reports of pre-burn EQ-5D domains and EQ-Index scores may be used to complement or serve as a substitute for the patient's assessment. Given the moderate agreement on the EQ-VAS, it may be less suited for proxy assessment.

Indexed as

agreementburnshealth-related quality of lifeprevalence adjusted kappaproxyretrospective study

Identifiers

PMID39604180
PMCPMC11575352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.