ArticleUltrasonography (Seoul, Korea)2025
Unraveling distinctions between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and CT/MRI for liver mass diagnosis.
Article in Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-frequency ultrasound combined with microbubbles for preoperative lymphatic mapping for lymphedema with a non-linear pattern in indocyanine green lymphography.European radiology · 2026Article
- Multiparametric Abdominal Ultrasound as a Source of Imaging Biomarkers in Predictive and Personalized Medicine: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Kupffer-phase Sonazoid ultrasound LI-RADS for liver cancer: diagnostic performance and algorithm modification.Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Article
- Ultrasonography in 2026: accelerating progress and defining the future of ultrasound.Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) offers a distinctive approach to liver mass diagnosis by utilizing intravenous contrast agents for enhanced visualization of vascular structures and tissue characterization. This review highlights the unique advantages of CEUS compared to computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), particularly focusing on the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System framework. Key differences include CEUS's realtime imaging capability, which minimizes arterial phase mistiming and improves detection of hyperenhancing lesions, and its ability to provide detailed washout patterns. Also, CEUS's intravascular nature and lower risk of adverse reactions make it a safer alternative for patients with renal impairment or those contraindicated for CT/MRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.