ArticleCurrent problems in cardiology2025
Association between polysocial risk score and CVH among women of reproductive age in the SAFE HEART study: An American Heart Association Research Goes Red Initiative.
Article in Current problems in cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Racial/ethnic differences in Life's Essential 8 and polysocial risk as an effect modifier among women of reproductive age.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Preconception cardiometabolic health and adverse pregnancy outcomes in hispanic and latina women: Expanding the prevention window.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Psychological Health, Polysocial Risk, and Cardiovascular Health Among Women of Reproductive Age.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo assess the association between polysocial risk factors and cardiovascular health (CVH) among women of reproductive age.
methodsOur cross-sectional analysis included women of reproductive age (18-44 years) from community settings and the American Heart Association's Research Goes Red (RGR) registry. Polysocial risk scores (0-14) reflected social disadvantage across domains including socioeconomic stability (education, employment, income, insurance, financial strain), living situation (housing stability, housing quality, marital status, home ownership), food security, transportation, utilities, and interpersonal safety. Suboptimal CVH was defined as having ≥2 risk factors from Life's Essential 8 metrics: physical activity, diet, body mass index, sleep, smoking, blood pressure, blood sugar, and cholesterol. Associations between polysocial risk and suboptimal CVH were analyzed using linear regression models
resultsSuboptimal CVH increased with higher polysocial risk, from 77.0 % in the lowest quartile to 95.2 % in the highest. Participants in quartile 3 had the highest odds of suboptimal CVH (aOR 9.52, 95 % CI 2.63-34.46), while quartile 4 showed decreased but significant odds (aOR 3.86, 95 % CI 1.03-14.40) compared to quartile 1. Hypertension (aOR 10.23, 95 % CI 3.61-29.01), diabetes (aOR 8.87, 95 % CI 3.12-25.24), hyperlipidemia (aOR 7.48, 95 % CI 2.72-20.55), and smoking (aOR 9.46, 95 % CI 3.25-27.56) were strongly associated with higher polysocial risk in community-enrolled participants, whereas trends were less consistent in RGR-enrolled participants.
conclusionsWomen with higher social risks face greater odds of suboptimal CVH. Screening for social determinants and tailored public health interventions are essential for mitigating CVH risks in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.