ArticleJournal of affective disorders2025
Anhedonia in flux: Understanding the associations of emotion regulation and anxiety with anhedonia dynamics in a sample with major depressive disorder.
Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The dynamics of loneliness: Longitudinal associations of anhedonia and dampening in a clinical sample of depressed individuals.Journal of affective disorders · 2026Article
- Identifying distinct trajectories of change in anhedonia during psychological treatment for depression.Psychological medicine · 2026Article
- Pathways to anhedonia in unmedicated major depressive disorder: the roles of insecure attachment and emotion dysregulation.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Acute suicidal ideation in context: highlighting sentiment-based markers through the diary entries of a clinically depressed sample.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Negative rumination and emotion regulation difficulties have been consistently linked with depression. Despite anhedonia-the lack of interest in pleasurable experiences-being a cardinal symptom of depression, emotion regulation of positive emotions, including dampening, are considered far less in the literature. Given that anhedonia may manifest through blunted responses to previously positive or enjoyable experiences, it is vital to understand how different positive emotion regulation strategies impact anhedonia symptom severity and how it can vary or change over time. Moreover, understanding the detrimental or protective nature of positive emotion regulation on anhedonia can aid with future anhedonia-focused treatments. Therefore, the current study examined the temporal association between anhedonia dynamics and two different emotion rumination strategies in response to positive emotions: dampening and positive rumination. Depressed persons (N = 137) completed baseline measures of positive emotion regulation, difficulties regulating negative emotions, and anxiety, and completed ecological momentary assessments three times per day for 90 days regarding their depressive symptoms, including anhedonia. We assessed baseline dampening and amplifying scores to predict anhedonia dynamics through four linear models with interactions. Providing partial support for our hypotheses, results indicate that amplifying positivity is positively associated with fluctuations, instability, and acute changes in anhedonia over the course of 90 days; however, neither dampening, difficulties regulating negative emotions, nor anxiety were related to anhedonia dynamics. The current findings suggest that amplifying positivity may be able to predict changes in anhedonia over time and should further be examined as a potential protective factor of anhedonia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.