ArticleNeuroscience letters2025
Activation of mouse skin mast cells and cutaneous afferent C-fiber subtypes by bee venom.
Article in Neuroscience letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In mammals, many Hymenopteran stings are characterized by pain, redness, and swelling - three manifestations consistent with nociceptive nerve fiber activation. The effect of a Western honeybee (Apis mellifera) venom on the activation of sensory C-fibers in mouse skin was studied using an innervated isolated mouse skin preparation that allows for intra-arterial delivery of chemicals to the nerve terminals in the skin. Our data show that honeybee venom stimulated mouse cutaneous nociceptive-like C-fibers, with an intensity (action potential discharge frequency) similar to that seen with a maximally-effective concentration of capsaicin. The venom had a stronger effect on chloroquine-sensitive C-fibers compared to chloroquine-insensitive C-fibers, an effect that was recapitulated with a wasp (Vespula spp.) venom. Blocking TRPV1 and TRPA1 channels did not influence the honeybee venom-induced C-fiber activation. The effect of the venoms on chloroquine-sensitive and -insensitive subpopulation of C-fiber terminals was mimicked by melittin but not apamin; two of peptide venom components. Chloroquine-sensitive C-fibers are stimulated as a consequence of mast cell activation. Melittin degranulated mast cells in mouse skin by a non-IgE and non-MrgprB2 mechanism, and this may explain the stronger activation of the chloroquine-sensitive C-fibers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.