ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2025
LCD benchmark: long clinical document benchmark on mortality prediction for language models.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The TRIPOD-LLM reporting guideline for studies using large language models: a Korean translation.Ewha medical journal · 2025Guideline
- Evaluation Frameworks for Clinical Foundation Models in Specific Tasks of Unstructured Medical Text Analysis: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Clinical temporal relation extraction with long-context transformers: a robustness study on MIMIC-III and MIMIC-IV.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Reporting guidelines for studies involving generative artificial intelligence applications: what do I use, and when?NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Analyzing Information Disparities across Modalities in Mortality Prediction.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Using tournaments to calculate AUROC for zero-shot classification with LLMs.Findings of ACL. EMNLP. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · 2025Article
- Aspect-Oriented Summarization for Psychiatric Short-Term Readmission Prediction.Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · 2025Article
- AgentMD: Empowering language agents for risk prediction with large-scale clinical tool learning.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Uncertainty Quantification for Clinical Outcome Predictions with (Large) Language Models.Findings of ACL. NAACL · 2025Article
- The TRIPOD-LLM reporting guideline for studies using large language models.Nature medicine · 2025Review
- Applications of generative artificial intelligence in outcome prediction in intensive care medicine-a scoping review.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
- Mortality prediction for ICU patients with mental disorders using large language models ensemble and unstructured medical notes.PloS one · 2025Article
- Probabilistic medical predictions of large language models.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe application of natural language processing (NLP) in the clinical domain is important due to the rich unstructured information in clinical documents, which often remains inaccessible in structured data. When applying NLP methods to a certain domain, the role of benchmark datasets is crucial as benchmark datasets not only guide the selection of best-performing models but also enable the assessment of the reliability of the generated outputs. Despite the recent availability of language models capable of longer context, benchmark datasets targeting long clinical document classification tasks are absent. MATERIALS AND
methodsTo address this issue, we propose Long Clinical Document (LCD) benchmark, a benchmark for the task of predicting 30-day out-of-hospital mortality using discharge notes of Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV and statewide death data. We evaluated this benchmark dataset using baseline models, from bag-of-words and convolutional neural network to instruction-tuned large language models. Additionally, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the model outputs, including manual review and visualization of model weights, to offer insights into their predictive capabilities and limitations.
resultsBaseline models showed 28.9% for best-performing supervised models and 32.2% for GPT-4 in F1 metrics. Notes in our dataset have a median word count of 1687. DISCUSSION: Our analysis of the model outputs showed that our dataset is challenging for both models and human experts, but the models can find meaningful signals from the text.
conclusionWe expect our LCD benchmark to be a resource for the development of advanced supervised models, or prompting methods, tailored for clinical text.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.