Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39602813›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2025

LCD benchmark: long clinical document benchmark on mortality prediction for language models.

WonJin Yoon, Shan Chen, Yanjun Gao, Zhanzhan Zhao, Dmitriy Dligach, Danielle S Bitterman, Majid Afshar, Timothy Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Analyzing Information Disparities across Modalities in Mortality Prediction.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Using tournaments to calculate AUROC for zero-shot classification with LLMs.Findings of ACL. EMNLP. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · 2025
    Article
  7. Aspect-Oriented Summarization for Psychiatric Short-Term Readmission Prediction.Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

WonJin YoonComputational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02215, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6435-548X
Shan ChenComputational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
Yanjun GaoDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9341-7360
Zhanzhan ZhaoComputational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
Dmitriy DligachDepartment of Computer Science, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL 60660, United States.
Danielle S BittermanComputational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
Majid AfsharDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6368-4652
Timothy MillerComputational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02215, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4513-403X

Funding

Learning Universal Patient Representations with Hierarchical TransformersR01LM012973 · NLM · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI Timothy A Miller · 2019 to 2026
$3.5M
Modeling Temporality with Natural Language Processing to Predict Readmission Risk of Patients with PsychosisR01MH126977 · NIMH · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI Mei-Hua Hall, Timothy A Miller · 2022 to 2026
$3.0M
NIH HHS R01LM012973NIH HHS R01MH126977NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH126977NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe application of natural language processing (NLP) in the clinical domain is important due to the rich unstructured information in clinical documents, which often remains inaccessible in structured data. When applying NLP methods to a certain domain, the role of benchmark datasets is crucial as benchmark datasets not only guide the selection of best-performing models but also enable the assessment of the reliability of the generated outputs. Despite the recent availability of language models capable of longer context, benchmark datasets targeting long clinical document classification tasks are absent. MATERIALS AND

methodsTo address this issue, we propose Long Clinical Document (LCD) benchmark, a benchmark for the task of predicting 30-day out-of-hospital mortality using discharge notes of Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV and statewide death data. We evaluated this benchmark dataset using baseline models, from bag-of-words and convolutional neural network to instruction-tuned large language models. Additionally, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the model outputs, including manual review and visualization of model weights, to offer insights into their predictive capabilities and limitations.

resultsBaseline models showed 28.9% for best-performing supervised models and 32.2% for GPT-4 in F1 metrics. Notes in our dataset have a median word count of 1687. DISCUSSION: Our analysis of the model outputs showed that our dataset is challenging for both models and human experts, but the models can find meaningful signals from the text.

conclusionWe expect our LCD benchmark to be a resource for the development of advanced supervised models, or prompting methods, tailored for clinical text.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingElectronic Health RecordsNatural Language ProcessingHumansNeural Networks, Computerclinical natural language processingelectronical health recordslarge language modellong clinical document

Identifiers

PMID39602813
PMCPMC11756648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.