Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39602270›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Cultural tightness and resilience against environmental shocks in nonindustrial societies.

Denis Tverskoi, Carol R Ember, Michele J Gelfand, Eric C Jones, Ian Skoggard, Louise Toutée, Sergey Gavrilets

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cultural tightness and social cohesion under coevolving beliefs, behaviors, and preferences.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Cultural tightness and resilience against environmental shocks in nonindustrial societies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Denis TverskoiDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996.
Carol R EmberHuman Relations Area Files, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.
Michele J GelfandStanford Graduate School of Business and Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0002-9780-9230
Eric C JonesSchool of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030.ORCID 0000-0002-0999-2726
Ian SkoggardHuman Relations Area Files, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.
Louise ToutéeHuman Relations Area Files, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.
Sergey GavriletsDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996.ORCID 0000-0003-1581-4018

Funding

John Templeton Foundation (JTF) 62434US Airforce FA9550-22-1-0250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With climate change intensifying, building resilience against climate-related shocks is now a global imperative. Historically, many societies have faced natural hazards, with some adapting through specific social and cultural practices. Understanding these responses is key to developing modern sustainability strategies. Here, we address this issue by developing a mathematical model explicitly accounting for various environmental shock dimensions, cooperative activities common in nonindustrial societies, and decision-making based on material factors as well as personal values and social norms. Our results suggest that cultural looseness can be vital for effectively responding to mild, slow-onset shocks, leading to moderate cooperation and minimal cultural change. Conversely, coping with severe shocks requires an intermediate level of cultural tightness, fostering significant cultural transformation and high cooperation. While tight societies struggle with new shocks, they may handle regular, severe, fast-onset shocks better than do loose societies. Our research enhances understanding of environmental impacts on cooperation, cultural tightness, and social resilience, and highlights cultural adaptations useful in addressing current environmental challenges like global warming, floods, tornadoes, and soil degradation.

Indexed as

cooperationcultural tightness-loosenessnatural hazardssocial resilience

Identifiers

PMID39602270
PMCPMC11626194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.