Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39602188›Full record

Trial reportClinical and translational gastroenterology2024

Liraglutide and Colesevelam Change Serum and Fecal Bile Acid Levels in a Randomized Trial With Patients With Bile Acid Diarrhea.

Anne-Marie Ellegaard, Martin L Kårhus, Lukasz Krych, David P Sonne, Julie L Forman, Svend H Hansen, Lars Ove Dragsted, Dennis S Nielsen, Filip K Knop

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and translational gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anne-Marie EllegaardCenter for Clinical Metabolic Research, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4389-3908
Martin L KårhusCenter for Clinical Metabolic Research, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark.
Lukasz KrychDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
David P SonneCenter for Clinical Metabolic Research, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark.
Julie L FormanSection of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Svend H HansenDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars Ove DragstedDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Dennis S NielsenDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Filip K KnopCenter for Clinical Metabolic Research, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark.

Funding

Novo Nordisk, Novo Nordisk Fonden, Fonden til Lægevidenskabens Fremme
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBoth liraglutide and colesevelam improve bile acid diarrhea symptoms. Colesevelam binds excess amounts of diarrhea-causing bile acids in the colon, whereas the mode of action for liraglutide remains elusive. In this article, we examined the impact of colesevelam and liraglutide treatment on the concentrations of bile acids in serum and feces and the fecal microbiota composition to better understand the 2 drugs' modes of action.

methodsBile acid species were analyzed in serum and fecal samples from a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial at baseline and after 3 and 6 weeks of orally administered colesevelam (1,875 mg twice daily, n = 26) or subcutaneously administered liraglutide (uptitrated by weekly increments of 0.6 mg from 0.6 to 1.8 mg daily, n = 26) in patients with 75 selenium-homotaurocholic acid test-verified, idiopathic, or postcholecystectomy bile acid diarrhea. Fecal microbiota composition was analyzed by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing at the same time points.

resultsColesevelam increased the fecal concentrations of all bile acid species, whereas it decreased serum concentrations of secondary bile acids. Liraglutide induced a small increase in serum unconjugated bile acid concentrations without affecting fecal bile acid concentrations. No changes in fecal microbiota composition were observed with either treatment. DISCUSSION: Colesevelam and liraglutide exhibit distinct effects on serum and fecal bile acid concentrations with colesevelam reducing serum concentrations of secondary bile acids and promoting fecal bile acid excretion, whereas liraglutide enhances serum concentrations of unconjugated bile acids, potentially through deceleration of small intestinal transit time allowing more time for passive absorption of bile acids.

Indexed as

Bile Acids and SaltsColesevelam HydrochlorideDiarrheaFecesLiraglutideAdministration, OralAdultAgedAnticholesteremic AgentsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansMaleMiddle AgedAnticholesteremic AgentsBile Acids and SaltsColesevelam HydrochlorideLiraglutide

Identifiers

PMID39602188
PMCPMC11596762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.