Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39602059›Full record

ArticleApplied health economics and health policy2025

Estimating a Drug's Price After Loss of Exclusivity as a Function of Its Cost of Goods Sold.

Melanie D Whittington, T Joseph Mattingly

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Applied health economics and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Action Plan to Better Approximate Reality in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses.Applied health economics and health policy · 2026
    Article
  4. Rethinking the unmet need for novel antibiotics.The Journal of antibiotics · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Melanie D WhittingtonCenter for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street #063, Boston, MA, 02111, USA. melanie.whittington@tufts.edu.
T Joseph MattinglyCollege of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe majority of cost-effectiveness analyses of pharmaceuticals do not incorporate future price changes that are expected once generic competition enters the market. A common rationale for not doing so is the uncertainty around what postloss of exclusivity price to model. The objective of this study is to assess if a drug's price postloss of exclusivity can be estimated on the basis of its cost of goods sold (COGS).

methodsFirst, stakeholders were engaged to understand pricing practices for generic drugs. Then peer-reviewed literature, gray literature, and manufacturer financial statements were reviewed to estimate the typical manufacturer profit margin over COGS. Using pricing data from the Mark Cuban CostPlus Drug Company (MCCPDC), estimates of COGS were calculated by drug form. Finally, a COGS-based approach to estimating a drug's price postloss of exclusivity was tested.

resultsCOGS were estimated for 2168 unique National Drug Codes (NDCs) reported in the MCCPDC price list by removing the typical manufacturer profit margin (50%) from the manufacturer prices (net of any markup or fees from the MCCPDC). A tablet/capsule, the most common form in the price list, had a median COGS of $0.10 per tablet/capsule. Estimating a drug's price postloss of exclusivity as the median COGS for that drug form times two (to reflect a 50% profit margin), produces estimates of postloss of exclusivity prices that account for drug-specific attributes.

conclusionsThis study provides an evidence-based approach to estimate a drug's price postloss of exclusivity as a function of its COGS for incorporation into cost-effectiveness analyses.

Indexed as

Drug CostsDrug IndustryDrugs, GenericCommerceCost-Benefit AnalysisCosts and Cost AnalysisHumansUnited StatesDrugs, Generic

Identifiers

PMID39602059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.