Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39602006›Full record

ArticlePaediatric drugs2025

Population Pharmacokinetics and Dose Optimization of Piperacillin in Infants and Children with Pneumonia.

Totsapol Jirasomprasert, Li-Yuan Tian, Dian-Ping You, Ya-Kun Wang, Lei Dong, Ya-Hui Zhang, Guo-Xiang Hao, John van den Anker, Yue-E Wu, Bo-Hao Tang and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatric drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Totsapol JirasomprasertDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), NMPA Key Laboratory for Clinical Research and Evaluation of Innovative Drug, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Li-Yuan TianDepartment of Respiratory Care, Children's Hospital of Hebei Province affiliated to Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Dian-Ping YouPediatric Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Hebei Province affiliated to Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Ya-Kun WangDepartment of Respiratory Care, Children's Hospital of Hebei Province affiliated to Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Lei DongDepartment of Pharmacy, Children's Hospital of Hebei Province affiliated to Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Ya-Hui ZhangDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), NMPA Key Laboratory for Clinical Research and Evaluation of Innovative Drug, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Guo-Xiang HaoDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), NMPA Key Laboratory for Clinical Research and Evaluation of Innovative Drug, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
John van den AnkerDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Yue-E WuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), NMPA Key Laboratory for Clinical Research and Evaluation of Innovative Drug, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Bo-Hao Tang *Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), NMPA Key Laboratory for Clinical Research and Evaluation of Innovative Drug, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China. tbh48@126.com.
Wei Zhao *Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), NMPA Key Laboratory for Clinical Research and Evaluation of Innovative Drug, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China. zhao4wei2@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1830-338X
Yi Zheng *Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), NMPA Key Laboratory for Clinical Research and Evaluation of Innovative Drug, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China. zhengyi@sdu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFC2706100National Natural Science Foundation of China 82173897Taishan Scholar Program of Shandong Province tstp20230660
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe aimed to determine the piperacillin disposition and optimize the dosing regimens for infants and children with pneumonia.

methodsAn opportunistic sampling strategy was used in this pharmacokinetic study. High-performance liquid chromatography was used to measure the concentrations of piperacillin in plasma samples. A population pharmacokinetic model was conducted using NONMEM.

resultsThe pharmacokinetic data of 90 samples from 64 infants and children with pneumonia (age range: 0.09-1.72 years for infants and 2.12-11.10 years for children) were available. A two-compartment model with first-order elimination was the most suitable model to describe the population pharmacokinetics of piperacillin. A covariate analysis indicated that body weight and age were significant factors affecting clearance. Monte Carlo simulations showed that a 50-mg/kg every 8 h or every 12 h dosing regimen results in underdosing. Results both in infants and children showed that an extended infusion (3 h) of various dosing regimens (80, 100, or 130 mg/kg) three times daily or a 300-mg/kg continuous infusion can reach a therapeutic level based on the chosen target for the probability of target attainment threshold of 70%, 80%, and 90% at minimum inhibitory concentration breakpoints of 8 mg/L and 16 mg/L.

conclusionsA population pharmacokinetic model was obtained to evaluate the disposition of piperacillin, and the optimal dosing regimens were provided for use in infants and children with pneumonia.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsPiperacillinPneumoniaChildChild, PreschoolDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansInfantMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsModels, BiologicalMonte Carlo MethodAnti-Bacterial AgentsPiperacillin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.