ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024
Impact of baseline renal impairment on severe neutropenia development in pemetrexed and carboplatin thoracic cancer treatment.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCarboplatin (CBDCA) plus pemetrexed (PEM) is a commonly-used thoracic cancer treatment. As both CBDCA and PEM are excreted via the kidneys, renal impairment (RI) can lead to severe neutropenia, the most typical adverse event in the treatment. We aimed to determine the impact of baseline RI on the development of severe neutropenia following real-world CBDCA + PEM-containing treatments.
methodsPatients with thoracic cancer receiving CBDCA + PEM-containing treatments (n = 155) were divided into a control group (baseline creatinine clearance [CCr] ≥ 60 mL/min) and an RI group (baseline CCr < 60 mL/min) and retrospectively evaluated. The primary endpoint was the incidence of severe neutropenia during the first cycle. We also assessed factors associated with the development of severe neutropenia.
resultsSevere neutropenia during the first cycle was confirmed in 41.2% of the patients in the RI group, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (20.7%, P = 0.02). Additionally, severe neutropenia during all evaluation periods was also more prevalent in the RI group compared to the control group (47.1% vs. 24.8%, P = 0.02). In contrast, the incidence of severe thrombocytopenia was not different. Multivariate logistic regression analyses identified RI as a risk factor for severe neutropenia (adjusted odds ratio 2.71; 95% confidence interval 1.18-6.21, P = 0.02 for the first cycle; 2.62, 1.17-5.84, P = 0.02 for all evaluation periods).
conclusionOur study revealed that patients with baseline RI exhibited severe neutropenia after CBDCA + PEM-containing treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39601964What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.