Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39601933›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024

Clinical pharmacist interventions on pain management in cancer patients (PharmaCAP) in low resource settings: a multicenter feasibility-pilot randomized controlled trial.

Sunil Shrestha, Simit Sapkota, Siew Li Teoh, Bhuvan Kc, Vibhu Paudyal, Shaun Wen Huey Lee, Siew Hua Gan

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05021393 (Impact of Clinical Pharmacist Intervention as a Part of the Multidisciplinary Team on Clinical Outcomes in Cancer Patients With Pain in Nepal), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05021393 nacompletednot on this map

Impact of Clinical Pharmacist Intervention as a Part of the Multidisciplinary Team on Clinical Outcomes in Cancer Patients With Pain in Nepal: A Feasibility Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial (PharmCaP Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMonash University MalaysiaRan2022 to 2023Enrolled92ConditionsCancer, Cancer PainArmsClinical Pharmacist Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Association of a standardized painless ward model with cancer pain control and hospitalization outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sunil ShresthaSchool of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, 47500, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia. Sunil.shrestha@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9174-7120
Simit SapkotaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Kathmandu Cancer Center, Tathali, Bhaktapur, Bagmati Province, Nepal.
Siew Li TeohSchool of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, 47500, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.
Bhuvan KcSchool of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Vibhu PaudyalSchool of Pharmacy, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Shaun Wen Huey LeeSchool of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, 47500, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.
Siew Hua GanSchool of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, 47500, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCancer pain management is frequently insufficient worldwide, especially in low- and middle-income countries where significant challenges related to workforce resources persist. Clinical pharmacists could potentially enhance outcomes in this context, yet their role remains largely unexplored.

objectivesThis study aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of integrating clinical pharmacists into the multidisciplinary team (MDT) to manage cancer pain and assess preliminary outcomes in cancer patients receiving pain treatment. This pilot study was undertaken to inform a future definitive randomized controlled trial (RCT).

methodsThe protocol was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05021393). The PharmaCAP trial was conducted in two oncology centers in Nepal, where patients were randomly enrolled into usual care (UC) or an intervention group (PharmaCAP). The latter received a clinical pharmacist-led medication review, which involved a comprehensive assessment of the patient's current medications, identification of potential drug-related problems, and personalized recommendations for optimizing pain management. This was accompanied by pain assessment, education and counseling on pain management strategies. Baseline and 4-weeks post-intervention assessments measured primary outcomes, i.e., feasibility metrics (recruitment of the patients, retention of patients, patient satisfaction). Secondary outcomes included pain intensity, health-related QoL, anxiety, depression, barriers to pain management, and medication adherence at 4 weeks.

resultsOut of 140 screened patients, 108 were evaluated for eligibility, with 16 opting out primarily due to lack of interest (n = 11) and communication barriers (n = 5). A total of ninety-two participants with cancer pain were randomized into two groups, with 91 patients successfully recruited and 85 (93.4%) completing 4 weeks post-intervention assessment). Completion rates for the UC and PharmaCAP groups were 91.3% and 93.4%, respectively. The primary feasibility outcomes were positive: 100% of patients found random allocation acceptable. Retention rates were high, with 91.3% in the UC group and 93.4% in the PharmaCAP group, despite a few dropouts due to being unreachable, COVID-related issues, and changes in treatment centers. No evidence of contamination between groups was found, as participants did not discuss interventions or influence each other's attitudes, ensuring effective isolation of interventions The PharmaCAP intervention showed significant improvement in QoL (P < 0.001), physical functioning (P < 0.001), and financial difficulties (P < 0.001). There was also clinical benefit observed in anxiety and depression (P < 0.001) and enhancements in medication adherence (P < 0.001). While pain intensity decreased in both groups, the difference was not statistically significant. Satisfaction with the PharmaCAP intervention was high, with 93.0% of participants expressing satisfaction and 88.3% acknowledging that the clinical pharmacists effectively addressed their drug-related queries.

conclusionFindings of this RCT demonstrate that integrating clinical pharmacists into the MDT team in low low-resource setting is feasible and shows promise in improving QoL, reducing anxiety and depression, and enhancing medication adherence among cancer patients. These findings support the feasibility of conducting a full-scale RCT. Enabling clinical pharmacists to assist with cancer pain management in low-resource settings can benefit patients, healthcare teams, and health systems.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05021393. Registered on 25th August 2022.

Indexed as

Cancer PainFeasibility StudiesPain ManagementPharmacistsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNepalPain MeasurementPatient Care TeamPilot ProjectsProfessional RoleCancer painCancer patientsClinical pharmacistFeasibility studyPilot trialRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.