Trial reportEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2025
Results of N = 1 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over discontinuation trials embedded in clinical practice after longer term methylphenidate use: a pilot study.
Trial report in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reply to Gringras et al. Comment on "Paditz et al. The Pharmacokinetics, Dosage, Preparation Forms, and Efficacy of Orally Administered Melatonin for Non-Organic Sleep Disorders in Autism Spectrum Disorder During Childhood and Adolescence: A Systematic Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity (ADHD) guidelines recommend that the need for continued stimulant medication treatment of children and adolescents needs to be reviewed at least annually. We aimed to assess the outcomes in clinical practice of placebo-controlled discontinuation trials after long-term methylphenidate treatment. We asked clinicians to implement N = 1 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over discontinuation trials after at least one year of methylphenidate treatment of children and adolescents (n = 26, 6-15 years of age). We analyzed the effectiveness of ongoing methylphenidate treatment compared to placebo on symptoms of ADHD, oppositional defiant disorder, and conduct disorder according to both parents and teachers, and the global improvement or deterioration according to the clinicians. We also assessed the proportion of individuals who continued using methylphenidate after the discontinuation trial. Teacher-rated hyperactivity and impulsivity symptoms were significantly lower during methylphenidate treatment compared to placebo (β = 3.80, SD = 1.69, t = 2.25, p =.04). No other significant differences were found between methylphenidate and placebo. Almost two-thirds (n = 16, 61.5%) of individuals continued using methylphenidate after the discontinuation trials, of which seven did not deteriorate during placebo according to their clinician. Our findings support the need for regular evaluations of methylphenidate treatment effectiveness and emphasize the importance of including the school setting when evaluating treatments. Better guidance for clinicians when to continue or cease methylphenidate treatment is urgently needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39601808What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.