ArticleDysphagia2025
A Pilot Study of a Modified Swallowing Screening Tool for Critically Ill Patients in the Intensive Care Unit.
Article in Dysphagia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association between swallowing function and Short Physical Performance Battery score in hospitalized adults with heart failure: A retrospective cohort study.JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The lack of early assessment tools for swallowing function in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) may lead to delays in oral intake. This study assessed the effectiveness of a new bedside swallowing screening tool in detecting dysphagia in patients in the ICU or isolation settings, where isolation settings refer to conditions such as COVID-19, where patient mobility is limited. We assessed swallowing function in 13 patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. To ensure patient safety, a bedside preliminary investigation was performed to assess the patient's alertness level, and ultrasound findings of the vocal cords were obtained. Patients were nasogastric(NG) tube feeding or fasted if they did not meet a certain readiness level. Additionally, patients who passed the preliminary investigation underwent methylene blue dye or citric acid swallowing tests if they had or had not undergone tracheostomy, respectively. The Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS) test was used to determine whether an oral diet was appropriate. Of the 13 patients, 1 failed to meet the criteria during the preliminary examination, and 12 underwent the examination and initiated oral intake. Significant differences were found in the GUSS scores between the tracheostomy and non-tracheostomy groups but not in the examination validity. NG tube was implemented if the examination criteria were not met at each stage. Patients who passed the newly developed dysphagia screening tool exhibited no aspiration symptoms post-oral feeding initiation, enabling their discharge. In conclusion, the proposed screening test can be performed safely and easily, allowing for early dysphagia detection, reduced aspiration risk, and safe oral feeding in patients in the ICU or isolation settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.