Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39601638›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024

Ranked Importance of Visual Function Outcome Measures in Choroideremia Clinical Trials.

Amandeep Singh Josan, Laura Jayne Taylor, Kanmin Xue, Jasmina Cehajic-Kapetanovic, Robert Edward MacLaren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amandeep Singh JosanNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford & NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Laura Jayne TaylorNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford & NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Kanmin XueNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford & NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jasmina Cehajic-KapetanovicNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford & NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Robert Edward MacLarenNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford & NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Clinical trials of novel therapies for choroideremia require robust and clinically meaningful visual function outcome measures. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) is mostly insensitive to changes in disease state, until late stages, and hence also to potential therapeutic gains after gene therapies. While the insensitivity of BCVA as an effective outcome measure is common wisdom, its low importance has not been rigorously demonstrated in the literature. This work uses statistical techniques to rank the relative importance of potential functional outcome measures in choroideremia. Methods: Retrospective dominance analysis was performed on data from a longitudinal interventional clinical trial performed at the Oxford Eye Hospital. Functional data from the untreated eye were analyzed and correlated with an anatomic measure of disease progression in the form of blue fundus autofluorescence area of the surviving outer retinal island. Each functional measure was then ranked in terms of variable importance. Results: Microperimetry was the functional measure ranking first in terms of variable importance, followed by time since baseline visit, Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity, high spatial frequency contrast sensitivity function, and low luminance visual acuity. Early Treatment Diabetic Screening chart BCVA under standard lighting conditions was ranked lowest among the panel of test modalities. Conclusions: Clinical trials in choroideremia for early and mid-stage disease would be justified in moving away from using standard BCVA as a clinical trial outcome measure as we have shown its sensitivity to be relatively low compared to microperimetry. We have also demonstrated how functional measures rank in terms of importance.

Indexed as

ChoroideremiaClinical Trials as TopicVisual AcuityAdultContrast SensitivityDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareRetrospective StudiesVisual FieldsVisual Field Tests

Identifiers

PMID39601638
PMCPMC11605660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.