Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39601636›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024

Novel Uveal Melanoma Patient-Derived Organoid Models Recapitulate Human Disease to Support Translational Research.

Lauren A Dalvin, Cynthia M Andrews-Pfannkoch, David R Miley, Tara L Hogenson, Samantha A Erickson, Shivani Malpotra, Kjersten J Anderson, Mohammed E Omer, Luciana L Almada, Cheng Zhang and 11 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Potential of Nanoparticle-Based Phototherapies for Future Treatment of Uveal Melanoma.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. The latestExpert opinion on drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Lauren A DalvinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
Cynthia M Andrews-PfannkochDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
David R MileyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
Tara L HogensonDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
Samantha A EricksonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
Shivani MalpotraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
Kjersten J AndersonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
Mohammed E OmerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
Luciana L AlmadaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
Cheng ZhangDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
Hu LiDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
Diva R SalomaoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
Carol L ShieldsWills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Sara E LallyWills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Rachel M MalschDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
James A ArmitageSchool of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Heather L HolmesDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
Michael F RomeroDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
Michael P FautschDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
Svetomir N MarkovicDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
Martin E Fernandez-ZapicoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Lila J. Rutten · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002379 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI NILUFER ERTEKIN-TANER · 2017 to 2026
$14.9M
New Therapuetics for Pancreatic CancerR01CA265050 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Mitesh Borad, Martin Ernesto Fernandez-Zapico · 2022 to 2026
$3.0M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002379NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS R01 CA265050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: A lack of representative human disease models has limited the translation of new and more effective treatments in uveal melanoma (UM), the most common primary adult intraocular malignancy. To fill this critical need, we developed and characterized a multicenter biobank of UM patient-derived organoids (PDOs). Methods: UM patients requiring enucleation from 2019 to 2024 donated tumor tissue for PDO generation. PDOs were cultured in Cultrex and compared to donor primary tumor using exome sequencing, RNA sequencing, and immunohistochemistry. The ability of PDOs to maintain the transformed phenotype was evaluated in an orthotopic xenograft model and monitored with fundus imaging. ATAC sequencing and drug response assays were done in a subset of PDOs to explore the feasibility of their use for mechanistic and translational studies. Results: PDOs were successfully established in 40 of 44 cases (91%), retained clinically relevant mutations and molecular markers from the primary tumor, and displayed similar gene expression profiles and well-validated clinical prognostic markers of the disease. PDOs retained tumorigenic capacity in an in vivo model resembling human disease progression. Finally, we demonstrated that PDOs were a feasible platform to identify and evaluate novel therapeutic targets and investigate differential, personalized drug response. Conclusions: PDO models offer a new platform with improved representation of human UM to aid in translational research for this dismal condition.

Indexed as

MelanomaOrganoidsTranslational Research, BiomedicalUveal NeoplasmsAgedAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorExome SequencingFemaleHumansMaleMiceMiddle AgedTumor Cells, CulturedUveal MelanomaBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID39601636
PMCPMC11605663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.