Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39601499›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

Attentional modulation of secondary somatosensory and visual thalamus of mice.

Gordon H Petty, Randy M Bruno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Presynaptic control of top-down signaling in neocortical layer 1.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Pathway-Specific Ultrastructure of Thalamocortical Synapses in Mouse Somatosensory Area S2.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Reward history guides focal attention in whisker somatosensory cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gordon H PettyDepartment of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2215-6714
Randy M BrunoDepartment of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5122-4632

Funding

Vision Sciences Training GrantT32EY013933 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Carol A. Mason, CAROL M TROY · 2001 to 2026
$5.3M
The Role of Dendrites in Thalamocortical CircuitryR01NS069679 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SIEGELBAUM, STEVEN A · 2010 to 2020
$3.5M
The behavioral functions of upper and lower cortical layersR01NS094659 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI COSTA, RUI M. · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
Academy of Medical Sciences APR6\1007NEI NIH HHS T32 EY013933NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS069679NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS094659Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 225210/Z/22/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Each sensory modality has its own primary and secondary thalamic nuclei. While the primary thalamic nuclei are well understood to relay sensory information from the periphery to the cortex, the role of secondary sensory nuclei is elusive. We trained head-fixed mice to attend to one sensory modality while ignoring a second modality, namely to attend to touch and ignore vision, or vice versa. Arrays were used to record simultaneously from the secondary somatosensory thalamus (POm) and secondary visual thalamus (LP). In mice trained to respond to tactile stimuli and ignore visual stimuli, POm was robustly activated by touch and largely unresponsive to visual stimuli. A different pattern was observed when mice were trained to respond to visual stimuli and ignore touch, with POm now more robustly activated during visual trials. This POm activity was not explained by differences in movements (i.e. whisking, licking, pupil dilation) resulting from the two tasks. Post hoc histological reconstruction of array tracks through POm revealed that subregions varied in their degree of plasticity. LP exhibited similar phenomena. We conclude that behavioral training reshapes activity in secondary thalamic nuclei. Secondary nuclei respond to the same behaviorally relevant, reward-predicting stimuli regardless of stimulus modality.

Indexed as

AttentionAnimalsFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPhotic StimulationThalamic NucleiThalamusVisual Perceptionhigher order thalamusmouseneurosciencePOpulvinarrodentsalience

Identifiers

PMID39601499
PMCPMC11602186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.