Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39601486›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

Development of patient-specific pre-treatment verification procedure for FLASH proton therapy based on time resolved film dosimetry.

K H Spruijt, J Godart, M Rovituso, Y Wang, E van der Wal, S J M Habraken, M Hoogeman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

K H SpruijtHollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands.
J GodartHollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands.
M RovitusoHollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands.
Y WangHollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands.
E van der WalHollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands.
S J M HabrakenHollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands.
M HoogemanHollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPre-clinical studies demonstrate that delivering a high dose at a high dose rate result in less toxicity while maintaining tumor control, known as the FLASH effect. In proton therapy, clinical trials have started using 250 MeV transmission beams and more trials are foreseen. A novel aspect of FLASH treatments, compared to conventional radiotherapy, is the importance of dose rate next to dose and geometry. Therefore, to ensure the safety and quality of FLASH treatments, patient-specific dose-rate verification before treatment is an important additional prerequisite. Various definitions of dose rate have been reported, however, the scanning proton beam (PBS) dose rate definition of Folkerts 2020 is currently the most used. It is the ratio between delta dose (ΔD) and delta time (Δt), subject to a predefined threshold, for a given position. Gafchromic film is a widely available detector used to perform relative and absolute integrated dose measurements. Since the response time of film is in the order of micro seconds it could also be suitable for pre-treatment verification of FLASH proton therapy. PURPOSE: Development of a patient-specific pre-treatment verification procedure for FLASH proton therapy based on time resolved film dosimetry. The detector design is presented and validated using three tests.

methodsA dedicated setup was built that holds a Gafchromic film and a high-speed camera to record the film during the irradiations. The red color channel of the camera's readings was converted into optical density (OD) and an OD-to-dose calibration curve was applied to determine the relative dose accumulation over time. To undo the film measurement (film response) of the post-irradiation coloration process, it is assumed that each dose deposit (pulse) results in a similar film response function. The convolution of the film response function over the pulse provides the film response. First the film response function was obtained by fitting this parameter onto a known film response and corresponding pulse. Post-irradiation coloration correction was performed by deconvoluting all film measurement by the obtained film response function. From the integral of each measured pulse, the Δt was obtained. Several validation tests were conducted: compare the Δt film measurement to a reference detector, exclude that revisiting spots result in an unwanted artefact on the dose accumulation measurement and thereby Δt, and compare Δt distributions of film measurement and simulation (local gamma evaluation, criteria 10%/2 mm) for nine QA fields (dose values; 12, 15, and 20 Gy, and, nozzle currents; 25, 120, and 215 nA). A similar analysis was performed for three dose optimized treatment beams, with and without scan patterns optimized on local dose rate.

resultsGood agreement was found for Δt comparing film to the reference detector, but for Δt values smaller than ∼20 ms the error becomes larger (≥15%). Dose accumulation measured with film over time from a single spot is independent of whether the dose is delivered at once, twice or thrice. All gamma evaluations resulted in a gamma pass rate of ≥90%.

conclusionsTime resolved film dosimetry to perform patient-specific pre-treatment verification in FLASH proton therapy is feasible.

Indexed as

Film DosimetryProton TherapyHumansRadiotherapy DosageTime FactorsFLASHGafchromic filmpre‐treatment verification

Identifiers

PMID39601486
PMCPMC11788253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.