ArticleProsthetics and orthotics international2024
Replication of clinical prosthetic sockets for research purposes.
Article in Prosthetics and orthotics international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multidimensional evaluation of a two-level-of-compliance quasi-passive prosthetic wrist: functional, biomechanical, cognitive and user-experience outcomes in trans-radial limb loss.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For research in the field of prosthetics to be representative of clinical realities, studies require inclusion of clinical standard prosthetic sockets. This necessitates involvement of a prosthetist (clinical professional) in any study, which is to truly explore the effectiveness of existing or novel prosthetic technologies. Unfortunately, there is a global shortage of prosthetists. With many technological advances in upper-limb prosthetics coming from engineering focused labs, it is unsurprising that studies are frequently conducted with anatomically intact individuals. In this paper, we present a method to clone the shape of a clinical standard prosthetic socket for research purposes. The technique uses silicone to capture the socket shape; this is then converted into a plaster mold, which can be used to manufacture an identically shaped socket using standard clinical manufacturing techniques. The whole process can be achieved without the involvement of a prosthetist. To validate the proposed technique, molds from an original socket and socket clone were 3D scanned. The distance between the aligned meshes were measured using CloudCompare software. The mean distance between the points on the 2 meshes was 0.16 mm (standard deviation 0.38 mm). This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that the proposed new approach to cloning a clinical standard prosthetic socket is feasible and accurate. This technique will facilitate improvements in the assessment of prosthetic technologies. The process is nondestructive, thus also opening opportunities for socket design and electrode placement research with the removal of confounding factors relating to socket shape.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.