Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39601464›Full record

ArticleProsthetics and orthotics international2024

Replication of clinical prosthetic sockets for research purposes.

Alix Chadwell, Laurence Kenney, Michael Prince, Jennifer Olsen, Matthew Dyson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prosthetics and orthotics international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alix ChadwellSchool of Healthcare Enterprise and Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9101-5202
Laurence KenneyCentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2164-3892
Michael PrinceCentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, UK.
Jennifer OlsenSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9076-3092
Matthew DysonSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8707-0137

Funding

Invention for Innovation NIHR201310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For research in the field of prosthetics to be representative of clinical realities, studies require inclusion of clinical standard prosthetic sockets. This necessitates involvement of a prosthetist (clinical professional) in any study, which is to truly explore the effectiveness of existing or novel prosthetic technologies. Unfortunately, there is a global shortage of prosthetists. With many technological advances in upper-limb prosthetics coming from engineering focused labs, it is unsurprising that studies are frequently conducted with anatomically intact individuals. In this paper, we present a method to clone the shape of a clinical standard prosthetic socket for research purposes. The technique uses silicone to capture the socket shape; this is then converted into a plaster mold, which can be used to manufacture an identically shaped socket using standard clinical manufacturing techniques. The whole process can be achieved without the involvement of a prosthetist. To validate the proposed technique, molds from an original socket and socket clone were 3D scanned. The distance between the aligned meshes were measured using CloudCompare software. The mean distance between the points on the 2 meshes was 0.16 mm (standard deviation 0.38 mm). This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that the proposed new approach to cloning a clinical standard prosthetic socket is feasible and accurate. This technique will facilitate improvements in the assessment of prosthetic technologies. The process is nondestructive, thus also opening opportunities for socket design and electrode placement research with the removal of confounding factors relating to socket shape.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsProsthesis DesignHumansProsthesis Fittingcloningprosthetic socketreplicationupper limbvalidation

Identifiers

PMID39601464
PMCPMC12147737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.