Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39601458›Full record

ArticleImmunity, inflammation and disease2024

Analysis of the Results of Tuberculosis Drug Resistance Surveillance in Yuexiu District, Guangzhou City, 2013-2022.

Xueqiu Li, Jianxiong Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Immunity, inflammation and disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xueqiu LiDepartment of One Branch, Guangzhou Chest Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0003-6610-1955
Jianxiong LiuState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis, Guangzhou Chest Hospital, Institute of Tuberculosis, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

This study was supported by the Guangzhou Municipal Health Science and Technology Project (20241A011048) and Guangzhou Science and Technology Program (2023A03J0539).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe objectives of the study are to understand the drug-resistant situation and trend of tuberculosis patients in Yuexiu District, Guangzhou City, from 2013 to 2022, and to provide a scientific basis for the development of rational drug-resistant tuberculosis prevention and control strategies in Guangzhou City.

methodsAll patients who were diagnosed with active tuberculosis in Guangzhou Chest Hospital from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2022 were collected as study subjects, and a total of 5191 patients were enrolled in the study. Comprehensive data on the basic characteristics, diagnostic, and therapeutic information of the study subjects were collected. Sputum specimens were subjected to smear, isolation, and culture. Culture-positive strains of bacteria were identified by bacterial groups. A total of 1659 strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) isolates were obtained. The drug susceptibility test was carried out using the proportionality method on the MTB isolates for nine types of antituberculosis medicines: isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RFP), ethambutol (EMB), streptomycin (Sm), kanamycin (Km), ofloxacin (Ofx), capreomycin (Cm), propylthioisonicotinamide (Pto), and p-aminosalicylic acid (PAS). A comparative analysis of the resistance patterns among the strains was conducted.

resultsA total of 1659 patients with MTB were cultured, revealing 438 drug-resistant cases. Among these, 255 were monoresistant, 121 were polyresistant, and 62 were multidrug resistant. The overall resistance rate was 26.40% (438/1659), with mono-resistance rate at 15.37% (255/1659), polyresistance rate at 7.29% (121/1659), and multidrug resistance rate at 3.74% (62/1659). In descending order, the resistance rates of MTB isolates to any of the nine antituberculosis drugs were Sm (12.24%, 203/1659), INH (9.22%, 153/1659), EMB (7.35%, 122/1659), RFP (6.99%, 116/1659), PAS (3.25%, 54/1659), Pto (3.13%, 52/1659), Ofx (2.71%, 45/1659), Cm (2.17%, 36/1659), and Km (2.17%, 36/1659). The differences in resistance rates were statistically significant (p < 0.01), with Sm exhibiting the highest resistance rate and Km the lowest. In the primary treatment group, 388 patients (25.55%) were drug resistant, while 50 patients (35.46%) in the retreatment group were drug resistant. Thirty-nine patients (2.57%) in the primary treatment group were multidrug resistant, compared to 23 patients (16.31%) in the retreatment group. The resistance rate and multidrug resistance rate of isolates from retreatment patients were significantly higher than primary treatment patients (p < 0.05).

conclusionsThe problem of drug-resistant tuberculosis transmission in Guangzhou requires attention, and drug-resistant screening should be further increased to effectively control the source of infection.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantAdolescentAdultAgedChildChinaDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAntitubercular Agents

Identifiers

PMID39601458
PMCPMC11600448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.