Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39601454›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of neurology2025

The rise and fall of Queckenstedt's test between 1916 and 1970, a milestone in spinal cord diagnostics and why it matters.

Armin Curt, Carl Moritz Zipser

Abstract readHistorical ArticleSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Armin CurtSpinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0136-8467
Carl Moritz ZipserSpinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4396-4796

Funding

Balgrist StiftungInternational Foundation for Research in Paraplegia P190Olga Mayenfisch StiftungSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 320030-231396Swiss Paraplegic Foundation Foko_2019_01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeIn 1916, Hans H. G. Queckenstedt (1876-1918) was the first to describe a test aimed at detecting spinal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) space obstruction through lumbar CSF pressure measurements in paraplegic patients. For this test, bilateral jugular vein compression was applied during lumbar puncture and consecutive changes in lumbar CSF pressure were then observed. Findings were rated as normal, or indicative of incomplete or complete spinal block. This test, known as Queckenstedt's test, became widely adopted and further developed in the field.

methodsThis systematic literature review provides an overview of the milestones in research using Queckenstedt's test.

resultsClinical research involving Queckenstedt's test was widely disseminated across the globe. In 1922, the proof of concept for Queckenstedt's test was provided by James B. Ayer (1882-1963) through simultaneous cisternal and lumbar CSF pressure measurements. He found that the cisternal (in contrast to lumbar) pressure remained responsive in cases with spinal block. The test was further refined up until the 1960s, and was considered a routine diagnostic procedure for testing of spinal canal obstruction. Developments in non-invasive spinal computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging led to a significant decline in interest in Queckenstedt's test, and the test eventually disappeared from textbooks and clinical routine. However, at the beginning of the 21st century there was renewed interest in revealing the biomechanical properties of the CSF through advanced recording and computational techniques to complement spinal imaging.

conclusionSpine and spinal cord physicians should be familiar with Queckenstedt's test, which not only represented a milestone in spinal diagnostics, but provided a physiological framework for the appreciation of spinal cord compression that is still valid today.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord DiseasesSpinal PunctureCerebrospinal Fluid PressureHistory, 20th CenturyHumansSpinal Cordcerebrospinal fluid pressurecompressive myelopathyspinal cord compressionspinal cord injuries

Identifiers

PMID39601454
PMCPMC11625948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.