ArticleActa dermato-venereologica2024
Clinical Risk Factors for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Patients with Actinic Keratosis or Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Situ: A Retrospective Double-cohort Study.
Article in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current and Future Perspectives in Mohs Micrographic Surgery for Non-Melanoma Skin Cancers: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Association between prescribed antidepressant medication and skin cancer (melanoma, basal cell carcinoma and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma) risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Skin health and disease · 2026Review
- C5aR1 Promotes Invasion, Metastasis, and Poor Prognosis in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.The American journal of pathology · 2025Article
- Prevalence of head and face actinic keratosis among older community residents aged ≥60 years in Shanghai: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Actinic keratosis and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in situ are precancerous forms of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. In this single-centre retrospective study, patients with histopathologically confirmed actinic keratosis (n = 121) or cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in situ (n = 99) as their initial keratinocyte-derived lesion were compared and evaluated with regard to development of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma during a 5-year observation period. Patients with severely dysplastic actinic keratosis or cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in situ as their initial lesion developed cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma more rapidly than patients with actinic keratosis with mild or moderate dysplasia. With either actinic keratosis or cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in situ as an initial lesion, advanced age, male sex, comorbidity with basal cell carcinoma, and immunosuppressive medication were associated with elevated risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma development. Regarding solely patient with actinic keratosis as their initial lesion male sex, advanced age, immunosuppressive medication, location of the initial lesion, and degree of dysplasia were associated with the risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Among patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in situ as their initial lesion, only aspirin usage was associated with increased risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. This study indicates that, among the vast and increasing population of patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma precursors, male patients with immunosuppressive medication who develop basal cell carcinoma should be regarded as at heightened risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma development and warrant closer surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.