ArticleArtificial organs2025
Safety of enoxaparin in patients implanted with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices.
Article in Artificial organs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Safety of enoxaparin in patients implanted with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices.Artificial organs · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe objective of this study is to determine the incidence of major bleeding events in patients implanted with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) bridged with enoxaparin (LMWH) compared to intravenous unfractionated heparin (IV UFH) for a subtherapeutic INR on warfarin.
methodsA single-center, retrospective, cohort study was conducted including patients with CF-LVADs implanted between January 1, 2012 and July 1, 2020 who received at least one inpatient dose or outpatient prescription for LMWH or IV UFH at least 60 days after CF-LVAD implantation. The primary endpoint was the incidence of major bleeding.
resultsIn total, 176 orders were screened and 90 orders in 62 unique patients were included. Major bleeding and thromboembolic events occurred in 1 (2.5%) versus 4 (10.0%) orders (p = 0.36) and 3 (7.5%) versus 1 (2.5%) orders (p = 0.62) in the LMWH and IV UFH groups, respectively. One patient had a fatal thromboembolic event in each group. More patients receiving IV UFH had minor bleeding events (10 [25.0%] vs. 3 [7.5%]; p = 0.03).
conclusionsThere was no difference between bleeding and thromboembolic events in patients implanted with CF-LVADs prescribed LMWH or IV UFH for bridging of subtherapeutic INRs. Larger prospective randomized data are needed to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.