ArticlePain management
Patient and staff perspectives on pain treatment experiences in a community clinic serving under-resourced older adults.
Article in Pain management. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protocol for a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial of a mind-body activity program for older adults with chronic pain in a medically underserved area: The iHOPE study.Contemporary clinical trials · 2025Article
- "You get tired of saying, this doesn't work": A qualitative study of chronic pain treatments among older Latino adults.Pain management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsChronic pain affects up to 37.8% of older adults with higher prevalence among those in under-resourced communities. While there are many treatments for chronic pain, there are complexities to treating under-resourced older adults in community clinics, including multimorbidity, barriers to treatment access, and varying degrees of openness to different treatment approaches. Understanding patient and clinic staff perceptions of treatment options for chronic pain is critical for implementing treatment approaches that will work sustainably in the community. This study aimed to understand clinic staff and patients' perspectives on chronic pain treatment experiences.
methodsFocus groups and individual interviews were analyzed using a hybrid inductive-deductive approach.
resultsThemes are: (1) Limited patient and clinic resources and availability affecting pain treatment experiences (e.g., copays, transportation challenges, and conflicting responsibilities), (2) Discrepancies in patient and staff approaches to treatment and the importance of trialing different pain management techniques to alleviate pain (e.g., trialing multiple treatments with varied success), and (3) Conflict between patients' desire for pain elimination vs. staffs' focus on symptom reduction and function (e.g., patient-staff disconnect).
conclusionsThese findings are important for determining how treatments can best fit the needs of under-resourced older adults with chronic pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.