ArticleBelitung nursing journal2024
Refining clinical judgment competence in nursing education in the Philippines: A mixed-methods study on the impact of the Philips 66 brainstorming technique in case-based learning.
Article in Belitung nursing journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06646068 (Refining Clinical Judgment Competence in Nursing Education), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Refining Clinical Judgment Competence in Nursing Education: The Impact of the Philips 66 Brainstorming Technique in Case-Based Learning
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinical judgment is crucial for nurses in complex healthcare settings. In the Philippines, nursing students must develop critical thinking and decision-making skills to handle resource-limited environments and challenging patient care. However, existing educational methods often fail to engage students and fully promote diverse perspectives. Objective: This study aimed to examine the effect of integrating the Philips 66 technique into Case-Based Learning (CBL) on enhancing clinical judgment competence among Filipino nursing students. Methods: This study utilized an explanatory sequential mixed methods design. The quantitative phase involved a true experimental pre-test/post-test design with 60 senior nursing students randomly assigned to intervention ( Results: The intervention group significantly outperformed the control group in both self-reported confidence and overall clinical judgment abilities. The Philips 66-CBL group showed significant improvements ( Conclusion: The combination of the Philips 66 technique with CBL significantly improves the clinical judgment abilities of Filipino nursing students in a shorter timeframe compared to conventional approaches. Insights from qualitative data highlight its effectiveness in fostering collaborative learning and preparing students for the challenges of dynamic clinical settings. Further research with larger, more diverse samples across different contexts is essential to confirm these findings and explore the long-term influence of Philips 66-CBL on nursing students' clinical judgment development worldwide. Trial Registry Number: NCT06646068 [clinicaltrias.gov]. Philippine Health Research Registry: PHRR241010-007605 [registry.healthresearch.ph].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.