ArticleRSC advances2024
Single and combined treatment processes for rhodamine B removal by coagulation-flocculation and adsorption.
Article in RSC advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Buckwheat Husk Biochars as Adsorbents for Cationic Dye Removal: Effect of Pyrolysis Temperature on Adsorption Performance.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bacopa monnieri biochar derived carbon nanospheres for pendimethalin remediation from water.Discover nano · 2026Article
- Removal of ciprofloxacin from aqueous solutions using GO/PVA/calcium alginate composite beads as an absorbent.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Engineering novel ceramic metal borates containing carbon for efficient sequestration of Toluidine Blue O from wastewater.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Tetracycline removal from an aqueous solution using bimetallic-impregnated activated carbon synthesized via one-step dry-pyrolysis of hawthorn kernels.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The synthesis of PEG/MoSRSC advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, two physico-chemical methods were adopted for the removal of rhodamine B from aqueous solutions. The first one is the adsorption process using biochar derived from olive stones (OSB). Results demonstrated that the removal efficiency reached 97.79% within an equilibrium time of one hour. It was observed that the pH had no significant effect on the degradation of rhodamine B by OSB. The adsorption process was characterized by the endothermic nature, spontaneity, favorability, and disorder at the solid-liquid interface. Langmuir isotherm analysis revealed a maximum adsorption capacity of 11.82 mg g
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.