ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2024
PlanText: Gradually Masked Guidance to Align Image Phenotypes with Trait Descriptions for Plant Disease Texts.
Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Open RGB imaging workflow for morphological and morphometric analysis of fruits using deep learning: a case study on almonds.GigaScience · 2026Article
- Location-guided lesions representation learning via image generation for assessing plant leaf diseases severity.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- TPDNet: Triple phenotype deepen networks for monocular 3D object detection of melons and fruits in fields.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Segmenting vegetation from UAV images via spectral reconstruction in complex field environments.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- PlantCaFo: An efficient few-shot plant disease recognition method based on foundation models.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Soft prompt-tuning for plant pest and disease classification from colloquial descriptions.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant diseases are a critical driver of the global food crisis. The integration of advanced artificial intelligence technologies can substantially enhance plant disease diagnostics. However, current methods for early and complex detection remain challenging. Employing multimodal technologies, akin to medical artificial intelligence diagnostics that combine diverse data types, may offer a more effective solution. Presently, the reliance on single-modal data predominates in plant disease research, which limits the scope for early and detailed diagnosis. Consequently, developing text modality generation techniques is essential for overcoming the limitations in plant disease recognition. To this end, we propose a method for aligning plant phenotypes with trait descriptions, which diagnoses text by progressively masking disease images. First, for training and validation, we annotate 5,728 disease phenotype images with expert diagnostic text and provide annotated text and trait labels for 210,000 disease images. Then, we propose a PhenoTrait text description model, which consists of global and heterogeneous feature encoders as well as switching-attention decoders, for accurate context-aware output. Next, to generate a more phenotypically appropriate description, we adopt 3 stages of embedding image features into semantic structures, which generate characterizations that preserve trait features. Finally, our experimental results show that our model outperforms several frontier models in multiple trait descriptions, including the larger models GPT-4 and GPT-4o. Our code and dataset are available at https://plantext.samlab.cn/.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.