ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2024
Association of metabolic score for insulin resistance with progression or regression of prediabetes: evidence from a multicenter Chinese medical examination cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel score to evaluate nonlinear association between insulin resistance and new-onset diabetes mellitus: A cohort analysis.Medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Prediabetes, diabetes, and the risk of progression to diabetes among working population in Beijing-the Tongren HealthCare Study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Association between Hemoglobin-albumin-lymphocyte-platelet score and all-cause or cardiovascular mortality in patients with diabetes or prediabetes: mediated effects of renal function.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Non-linear association between metabolic score for insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus in normal-weight middle-aged and older Chinese adults: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Few studies have evaluated the changes in blood glucose status in individuals with prediabetes, and this study aimed to analyze the association between metabolic score for insulin resistance (MetS-IR) and the progression or regression of prediabetes. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used research data from medical examination institutions under the Rich Healthcare Group in 32 regions across 11 cities in China. Progression of prediabetes to diabetes and regression to normal fasting glucose (NFG) were defined based on glycemic changes during follow-up. The association between MetS-IR and the progression or regression of prediabetes was analyzed using multivariate Cox regression, restricted cubic splines, and piecewise regression models. Results: Data from 15,421 prediabetic subjects were analyzed. Over an average follow-up of 2.96 years, 6,481 individuals (42.03%) returned to NFG, and 2,424 (15.72%) progressed to diabetes. After controlling for confounding factors, an increase in MetS-IR was observed to increase the risk of diabetes onset in the prediabetic population, whereas a decrease in MetS-IR had a protective effect for returning to NFG. Additionally, a nonlinear relationship between MetS-IR and prediabetes regression was observed, with 37.22 identified as the inflection point; prediabetes regression rates were significantly higher before this point and markedly decreased after it. Conclusion: For individuals with prediabetes, an increase in MetS-IR may lead to an increased risk of diabetes; conversely, a decrease in MetS-IR enhances the protective effect for returning to NFG and keeping MetS-IR below 37.22 is significant for the regression of prediabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.