ArticleAEM education and training2024
Changing behavior and promoting clinical empathy through a patient experience curriculum for health profession students.
Article in AEM education and training, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From stigma to support: the mediating role of sympathy between nurses' perceived stigma and helping behavior tendency for alcohol use disorder.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Exploring the Relationship Between Flourishing and the Light Triad of Personality in Honduran Adults.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Changing behavior and promoting clinical empathy through a patient experience curriculum for health profession students.AEM education and training · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The authors sought to explore how a curriculum that uses a patient experience simulation followed by reflection can lead to clinical empathy in learners and whether this experience leads to behavioral change. Further, in response to critiques of common pragmatic approaches to clinical empathy teaching in which empathy is operationalized and taught through formal trainings and checklists, the study aimed to contribute insights regarding how clinical empathy may best be taught to health profession students. Methods: Twenty-six senior medical students participated in an in situ patient experience simulation during a 4-month period in 2021-2022 in an academic emergency department. The simulation was followed by a written reflection and a structured debrief. A thematic analysis was performed on transcripts of the group debriefs. Results: In the group debriefs, learners described several empathetic behavioral changes they made after this intervention. First, learners discussed performing more small acts of kindness to improve patient care and humanize the patient experience. Second, learners discussed seeking to improve their communication through acknowledgment and validation of the patient experience. Finally, learners described actions to keep patients informed through frequent check-ins and setting expectations on time. Conclusions: The findings suggest that empathy may not be simply transactional for health profession students and that an understanding of the patient experience leads to actions that improve the patient experience and alleviate suffering.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.