ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2024
Ultrasonographic assessment of ocular parameters in dogs: effects of weight and breed, controlled for BCS and age.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ocular Manifestations of Canine Parvovirus in Juvenile Dogs: Tear Production, Intraocular Pressure, Fundoscopic Findings, and Ultrasonographic Measurements.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Article
- Ultrasonographic Ocular Biometry of the Greater Caribbean Manatee (Trichechus manatus manatus).Veterinary ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Ophthalmic ultrasound is useful tool for examining canine eyes. Previous studies have compared ocular parameters using ophthalmic ultrasonography based on body weight, breed, sex, and age. However, there are limited studies involving large numbers of dogs with controlled body condition score. Furthermore, to the authors' knowledge, there are no established parameters that can be used independently of body weight. The aim of this study was (1) to compare ultrasonography ocular parameters based on body weight, breed, sex, and age in dogs with an ideal body condition score, (2) to establish normal reference ranges for ultrasonography ocular parameters on a large number of samples, (3) to establish an ultrasonography ocular parameter ratio that can be used regardless of body weight. Methods: A total of 225 dogs were collected, of which 120 dogs without abnormalities on ophthalmologic and clinical examinations were included according to the inclusion criteria. The ocular parameters measured were the anterior chamber (AC), vitreous chamber (VC), lens axial length (LAL), lens equatorial length (LEL), and globe axial length (GAL). Results: In LEL and GAL, a strong positive correlation was observed with body weight, and significant differences were identified between all body weight groups ( Discussion: This study identified significant correlations between LEL, GAL, and body weight in dogs with ideal body condition. We established normal reference ranges for ocular parameters within each BW group and breed based on a large number of samples. In addition, we present the LEL:GAL ratio, which is a constant value regardless of body weight or breed, as expected to be clinically useful in ocular evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.