ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2024
A Multidisciplinary Standardized Patient Simulation for Using Trauma-Informed Care for Pregnant Patients.
Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of a Telesimulation Program to Support Psychosocial Communication Training for Neonatology Fellows.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development of a Joint-Specialty Simulation-Based Workshop to Optimize Counseling at Extreme Prematurity.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2026Article
- A Community-Based Trauma-Informed Care Curriculum on Women's Health for Third-Year Medical Students.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2026Article
- A Trauma-informed Care Curriculum for Perinatal Providers, Staff, and Learners.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pregnant patients with prior traumatic experiences and their providers face challenges during prenatal care, peripartum, and postpartum. To date, no structured simulations have been published focused on improving care for patients in subsequent pregnancies. Methods: This multidisciplinary simulation included trainees and providers. Standardized patients were used. The patient was multiparous with a remote history of substance use and was initiating prenatal care late due to concerns related to the prior traumatic experience of losing custody of a newborn after a Department of Children and Family Services report had been opened in a prior pregnancy. Simulation participants completed the prenatal intake and counseling regarding this prior experience. Debriefing sessions reviewed critical actions, including collecting a history, empathizing with the patient, praising efforts to maintain pregnancy health, discussing available resources, constructing a plan for care, and utilizing motivational interviewing techniques. The simulation and debriefing sessions were allotted 30 minutes total. Pre- and postsimulation surveys evaluated for increased comfort and knowledge in caring for patients with prior traumatic experiences. Results: Simulation participants included obstetrics and gynecology students and residents, nurses, advanced practice providers, generalist attendings, and maternal fetal medicine fellows and attendings. Sixty participants completed the presimulation survey. Twenty-seven (45%) completed the postsimulation survey. Responses were paired for analysis. Scores on knowledge assessments improved postsimulation ( Discussion: This simulation led to improved background knowledge and comfort regarding providing trauma-informed care during pregnancies impacted by a prior traumatic event.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.