Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39600781›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Understanding Social Media Addiction: A Deep Dive.

Jashvini Amirthalingam, Anika Khera

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jashvini AmirthalingamGeneral Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Anika KheraMedicine, Basis Education, Scottsdale, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social media, integral to contemporary life, offers significant connectivity and entertainment benefits. However, its pervasive use has given rise to social media addiction, particularly among teenagers, characterized by excessive screen time, compulsive checking, and detrimental effects on real-life relationships and responsibilities. This addiction is driven by a combination of psychological factors, such as low self-esteem and mental health issues, technological mechanisms like infinite scrolling and personalized notifications, and social influences, including peer pressure and exposure to idealized content. Effective management of social media addiction requires a multifaceted approach. Behavioral interventions, such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and mindfulness training, educational initiatives that raise awareness about addiction risks, and parental strategies involving boundaries and monitoring can collectively mitigate the negative impacts of social media. Implementing these strategies is crucial for fostering healthier online behaviors and improving overall well-being among teenagers.

Indexed as

mental healthpeer pressuresocial media addictionsocial media platformteenagers

Identifiers

PMID39600781
PMCPMC11594359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.