Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39600761›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Exploring Trauma Simulation: Insights from the Simulation in Trauma Across Resident Training (START) Study and Trainee Experiences.

Jeremy Chan, James Barnett, Charmilie Chandrakumar, Amit Zaveri, Jamie McConnell, Kapil Sugand, Akash Patel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jeremy ChanGeneral Medicine, Foundation Programme, Colchester Hospital, Colchester, GBR.
James BarnettTrauma and Orthopedics, Royal National Orthopedic Hospital, London, GBR.
Charmilie ChandrakumarTrauma and Orthopedics, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.
Amit ZaveriTrauma and Orthopedics, Royal National Orthopedic Hospital, London, GBR.
Jamie McConnellTrauma and Orthopedics, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.
Kapil SugandTrauma and Orthopedics, Royal National Orthopedic Hospital, London, GBR.
Akash PatelTrauma and Orthopedics, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction and objective Advancements in technology have presented an opportunity to incorporate simulation training into the trauma and orthopedic (T&O) curriculum. This study aimed to assess the perspective of T&O trainees regarding the acceptability and perceived educational impact of simulation training before and after a training day. This includes identifying the resources that trainees are likely to use and find helpful when preparing for a new or unfamiliar procedure, as well as evaluating their opinions on different levels of simulation fidelity. The null hypothesis for this study is that there is no difference in educational value after exposure to various simulation modalities. Methods This was a three-arm crossover cohort observational study involving 18 T&O specialty trainees in their first three years of training who attended a simulation training course, involving four independent stations with simulation tasks of varying fidelities. Pre-course and post-course questionnaires with a 10-point Likert scale to determine if simulation training exposure affected the perception of educational value. Data were treated non-parametrically with median (±median absolute deviation; 95% Bonnett-Price CI). Statistical significance was calculated using the Mann-Whitney U test and set as p<0.05. Results Twelve trainees (67%) had not previously used orthopedic simulators to prepare for unfamiliar operations. Ninety-four percent of trainees thought that simulation training could support safe practice, and all trainees considered simulation to be useful for training. Trainees strongly emphasized the importance of simulation training (pre-course vs. post-course median score: 7 vs. 9, p=0.01), the necessity for it to be readily assessable (9 vs. 10, p=0.061), its role in formal assessment (4 vs. 8, p=0.006), and being able to become a better surgeon from it (7 vs. 8, p=0.078). Conclusions T&O trainees acknowledged the value of simulation training in complementing their operating numbers; however, their access to these resources was limited - a problem well recognized in current literature. The gap in the implementation of simulation training should be addressed for T&O trainees to benefit from these resources fully.

Indexed as

covid-19orthopedic surgeonsorthopedic surgerysimulation trainingvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID39600761
PMCPMC11595558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.