ArticleOTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma2024
Predicting deep infection in pilon and tibial plateau fractures: a secondary analysis of the VANCO and OXYGEN trials.
Article in OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To develop and validate a prediction model for a deep surgical site infection (SSI) after fixation of a tibial plateau or pilon fracture. Design: Pooled data from 2 randomized trials (VANCO and OXYGEN). Setting: Fifty-two US trauma centers. Patients: In total, 1847 adult patients with operatively treated tibial plateau or pilon fractures who met criteria for a high risk of infection. Intervention: We considered 13 baseline patient characteristics and developed and externally validated prediction models using 3 approaches (logistic regression, stepwise elimination, and machine learning). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary prediction model outcome was a deep SSI requiring operative debridement within 182 days of definitive fixation. Our primary prognostic performance metric for evaluating the models was area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with clinical utility set at 0.7. Results: Deep SSI occurred in 75 VANCO patients (8%) and in 56 OXYGEN patients (6%). The machine learning model for VANCO (AUC = 0.65) and stepwise elimination model for OXYGEN (AUC = 0.62) had the highest internal validation AUCs. However, none of the external validation AUCs exceeded 0.64 (range, 0.58 to 0.64). Conclusions: The predictive models did not reach the prespecified clinical utility threshold. Our models' inability to distinguish high-risk from low-risk patients is likely due to strict eligibility criteria and, therefore, homogeneous patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.