Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39600714›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2024

Mapping the Future: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA in Colorectal Cancer.

Chengzu Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Chengzu WangClinical Laboratory, Affiliated Cixi Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-5161-8375

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most prevalent malignancies worldwide, with rising incidence and mortality rates presenting substantial public health challenges. Traditional detection methods have inherent limitations, which has led to growing interest in liquid biopsy technologies for the identification of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). The aim of this study is to explore the developmental trends and future prospects of ctDNA in colorectal cancer through bibliometric analysis. Methods: This bibliometric analysis examines the literature on ctDNA in CRC from 2004 to 2024, utilizing the Web of Science Core Collection database to identify research trends, key areas of interest, and potential future directions. The R package "bibliometrix" and VOSviewer software were employed for bibliometric analysis and visualization. The analysis encompassed an evaluation of publication volume, contributing authors, influential journals, country and institutional contributions, and citation metrics. Results: The analysis encompassed a total of 1,054 publications, demonstrating a marked escalation in research activity since 2015. The journal "Cancers" has been identified as the most prolific publisher within this domain. Prominent researchers, including Bardelli A and Sartore-Bianchi A, have made substantial contributions to the field. The United States is the leading country in terms of both publication volume and citation frequency, followed by China and Italy. A keyword analysis identified seven conceptual clusters, with "circulating tumor DNA" and "liquid biopsy" emerging as predominant themes. Conclusion: This study emphasizes the evolving emphasis on the clinical applications of ctDNA, encompassing early detection, treatment monitoring, and prognostic assessment in CRC, thereby underscoring its potential as a non-invasive biomarker in oncology.

Indexed as

bibliometric analysiscirculating tumor DNAcolorectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID39600714
PMCPMC11590644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.