ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
The established of a machine learning model for predicting the efficacy of adjuvant interferon alpha1b in patients with advanced melanoma.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A nomogram for predicting overall survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving radiotherapy combined with targeted therapy: a multicenter retrospective study.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Influential factors affecting the survival benefit of combined neoadjuvant therapy and esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: an analysis based on the SEER database.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Interferon-alpha1b (IFN-α1b) has shown remarkable therapeutic potential as adjuvant therapy for melanoma. This study aimed to develop five machine learning models to evaluate the efficacy of postoperative IFN-α1b in patients with advanced melanoma. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 113 patients with the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage III-IV melanoma who received postoperative IFN-α1b therapy between July 2009 and February 2024. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Five machine learning models (Decision Tree, Cox Proportional Hazards, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and LASSO regression) were developed and compared for their capacity to predict the outcomes of patients. Model performance was evaluated using concordance index (C-index), time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and decision curve analysis. Results: The 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year RFS rates were 71.10%, 43.10%, and 31.10%, respectively. For OS, the 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year OS rates were 99.10%, 82.30%, and 75.00%, respectively. The Decision Tree (DT) model demonstrated superior predictive performance with the highest C-index of 0.792. Time-dependent ROC analysis for predicting 1-, 2-, and 3-year RFS based on the DT model is 0.77, 0.79 and 0.76, respectively. Serum albumin emerged as the important predictor of RFS. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the considerable efficacy DT model for predicting the efficacy of adjuvant IFN-α1b in patients with advanced melanoma. Serum albumin was identified as a key predictive factor of the treatment efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.