Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39600667›Full record

ReviewActa medica Philippina2024

A Review on Depression Care in the Philippines-Gaps and Recommendations for Better Patient Outcomes.

Robert D Buenaventura, Josefina S Isidro-Lapeña, Jermaine M Lim, Grace E Brizuela

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta medica Philippina, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robert D BuenaventuraCollege of Medicine, La Consolacion University Philippines, Malolos, Bulacan, Philippines.
Josefina S Isidro-LapeñaDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine and Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Jermaine M LimMedical Lead, Viatris, Philippines.
Grace E BrizuelaEmerging Markets Medical Portfolio Implementation Lead, Viatris, Philippines.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Epidemiological studies on the prevalence and management of depression are limited in the Philippines. This review aimed to assess the prevalence of depression in the Philippines and explore the distribution of patient journey touchpoints including awareness, screening, diagnosis, treatment, adherence, and remission of depression. Methods: A structured literature search was conducted in the Medline, Embase, Biosis, and HERDIN PLUS databases to identify records published in English between 01 January 2010 and 31 December 2019 that reported key patient journey touchpoints in depression management in the Philippines. An unstructured literature search was conducted in public or government websites with no date restriction. Data from all sources were extracted and presented descriptively. Results: Of the 348 records retrieved, one article was included in the final analysis. The prevalence of depression was reported to be 3.34% in the Philippines. There was no data available on any of the identified patient journey touchpoints in depression. Conclusion: The study findings highlight the need for more evidence-based studies in the Philippines to accurately understand the complexity of patient journey in patients with depression. This in turn can help in optimizing resource utilization, providing guidance for clinical practice, and health care reforms in the Philippines.

Indexed as

depressionevidence mappatient journey touchpointsPhilippinesprevalence

Identifiers

PMID39600667
PMCPMC11586288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.