ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Ultrasound versus computed tomography guided percutaneous needle biopsy for subpleural pulmonary lesions.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasound- versus CT-guided Biopsy of Pleural-contact Pulmonary Lesions: A Comparative Analysis of Diagnostic Performance and Procedural Complications.Thoracic research and practice · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Yield and Safety of Pulmonologist-Performed Ultrasound-Guided Transthoracic Core Biopsy: A Seven-Year Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sub-pleural pulmonary lesions (SPLs) can be diagnosed by percutaneous needle biopsy (PNB) guided by both computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US). This investigation aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy and safety between US- and CT-guided PNB for SPLs. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed SPL patients who underwent CT- or US-guided PNB in our hospital between January 2022 to January 2023. Furthermore, the technical success rates, duration of procedure, diagnostic yield, diagnostic accuracy, pneumothorax rates, and hemoptysis rates were compared between the 2 groups. Pneumothorax risk factors were assessed via the univariate and multivariate logistic regression tests. Results: The data indicated that 213 patients who underwent CT- (n = 108) or US-guided (n = 105) PNB diagnosis had SPLs at the final diagnosis. Furthermore, both groups indicated similar operation times (20.1 ± 8.1 min Conclusions: In summary, this research indicated that both US- and CT-guided PNB have high diagnostic accuracy for SPLs. However, US guidance may provide better safety than CT guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.