ArticleUrology annals
Outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy using self-cut mesh on pelvic organ prolapse.
Article in Urology annals. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy as an Effective Treatment for Late Sigmoid Neovagina Prolapse with Colonic Polyps.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of the study was to investigate the long-term outcome and complication rate of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) using self-cut mesh as pelvic organ prolapse treatment. Methods: A retrospective cohort study on patients undergoing LSC was done at Kameda Medical Center from January 2013 to January 2018. Data for this study were taken from all women with pelvic organ prolapse who had undergone LSC using self-cut polypropylene mesh. Patients with a previous history of hysterectomy were excluded from the study. An evaluation was done preoperatively, on 6-month and 1-year postoperative follow-up period using Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) and The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-short form (ICIQ-SF) questionnaire. Results: There were 702 subjects who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The clinical characteristics of the subjects were recorded. The scores during admission, 6 months and 1 year postoperative are: POP Q scores: 6.50 ± 5.69 vs. 5.11 ± 4.85 vs. 4.78 ± 4.31, Conclusion: LSC using self-cut mesh could produce satisfactory results in pelvic organ prolapse patients on 6-month and 1-year follow-up period with minimal perioperative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.