ArticleUrology annals
Does tilt-retrograde intrarenal surgery enhance stone clearance and offer better surgical ergonomics in patients with renal calculi? A prospective randomized control study.
Article in Urology annals. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Intraoperative positioning strategies to improve stone-free outcomes during retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of a head-up position on stone retrieval efficiency and intrarenal pressure using a flexible navigable suction access sheath: an in vitro study.Urolithiasis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is the standard treatment for renal calculi. Direct visualization and fragmentation are its major advantages. The variable stone clearance rates and the ergonomic challenges faced by urologists are a few limitations. Table tilt enhances stone clearance and improves surgical ergonomics by facilitating better access to stones and reducing procedural strain. Subjects and Methods: In this prospective study, patients with intrarenal calculi were randomized into standard lithotomy RIRS (S-RIRS) and table-tilted RIRS (T-RIRS) groups. Specified table tilts were suggested for each of the stone locations. The outcomes with regard to stone clearance, operative and lasing time, and ergonomics were studied. Results: About 100 patients were studied, with 50 in each group. The overall operating time and lasing time in the T-RIRS group were less than that in the S-RIRS group ( Conclusions: This is the first study to document the distinct advantages of T-RIRS and its benefits on surgical ergonomics. T-RIRS resulted in significantly shorter operative and lasing times, particularly for stones in lower calyces. Surgical ergonomics, assessed by the Borg CR-10 scale, were significantly better in the T-RIRS group. T-RIRS should become a standard of care for patients undergoing RIRS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.