Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39600581›Full record

ArticleUrology annals

Factor associated with postoperative complications of inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer Test.

Phatsinee Likitpanpisit, Satit Siriboonrid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urology annals. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Phatsinee LikitpanpisitDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Royal Thai Army, Bangkok, Thailand.
Satit SiriboonridDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Royal Thai Army, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) is the standard of care for palpable, biopsy-proven lymph node metastases or high-risk groups for nonpalpable lymph nodes in the treatment of penile cancer. ILND is associated with a significant incidence of complications and adverse events, specifically wound complications. Few studies have identified risk factors related to postoperative ILND complications. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of 30-day postoperative complications and to identify risk factors associated with postoperative complications of ILND for penile cancer. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective review of medical records for all patients who had ILND for penile cancer between January 2012 and December 2022. According to the modified Clavien-Dindo classification, the 30-day postoperative complications were collected. Using an ordinal univariate logistic regression model and multivariate analysis, potential risk variables for complications were determined. Results: A total of 60 patients were performed ILND. Sixty percent of the patients had a postoperative complication including wound infection 50%, wound dehiscence 36.7%, skin necrosis 26.6%, lymphocele 33.3%, leg edema 46.7%, and scrotal edema 16.7%. Higher grade of modified Clavien-Dindo classification was associated with body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.15; Conclusion: ILND is associated with high rates of complication. The severity of the modified Clavien-Dindo classification was associated with BMI and bilateral ILND.

Indexed as

Complicationinguinal lymph node dissectionpenile cancerrisk factor

Identifiers

PMID39600581
PMCPMC11587939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.