Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39600473›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of clinical cases2024

Current evidence on artificial intelligence in regional anesthesia.

Bhanu Pratap Swain, Deb Sanjay Nag, Rishi Anand, Himanshu Kumar, Pradip Kumar Ganguly, Niharika Singh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of clinical cases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Bridging complexity: AI-guided regional anaesthesia in anticoagulated trauma patients.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bhanu Pratap SwainDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Tata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur 831001, India.
Deb Sanjay NagDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Tata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur 831001, India. ds.nag@tatasteel.com.
Rishi AnandDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Tata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur 831001, India.
Himanshu KumarDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Tata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur 831001, India.
Pradip Kumar GangulyDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Tata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur 831001, India.
Niharika SinghDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Tata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur 831001, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent advancement in regional anesthesia (RA) has been largely attributed to ultrasound technology. However, the safety and efficiency of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks depend upon the skill and experience of the performer. Even with adequate training, experience, and knowledge, human-related limitations such as fatigue, failure to recognize the correct anatomical structure, and unintentional needle or probe movement can hinder the overall effectiveness of RA. The amalgamation of artificial intelligence (AI) to RA practice has promised to override these human limitations. Machine learning, an integral part of AI can improve its performance through continuous learning and experience, like the human brain. It enables computers to recognize images and patterns specifically useful in anatomic structure identification during the performance of RA. AI can provide real-time guidance to clinicians by highlighting important anatomical structures on ultrasound images, and it can also assist in needle tracking and accurate deposition of local anesthetics. The future of RA with AI integration appears promising, yet obstacles such as device malfunction, data privacy, regulatory barriers, and cost concerns can deter its clinical implementation. The current mini review deliberates the current application, future direction, and barrier to the application of AI in RA practice.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceMachine learningNerve blockRegional anesthesiaUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID39600473
PMCPMC11514339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.