ReviewWorld journal of clinical cases2024
Current evidence on artificial intelligence in regional anesthesia.
Review in World journal of clinical cases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning-Based Tracking of Neurovascular Features Toward Semi-Automated Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Nerve Blocks by Non-Specialists.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advances of regional nerve blocks for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: precision, innovation, and future directions.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Bridging complexity: AI-guided regional anaesthesia in anticoagulated trauma patients.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025Article
- Transforming Perioperative Care: Evolving Paradigms of the Expanding Role of Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recent advancement in regional anesthesia (RA) has been largely attributed to ultrasound technology. However, the safety and efficiency of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks depend upon the skill and experience of the performer. Even with adequate training, experience, and knowledge, human-related limitations such as fatigue, failure to recognize the correct anatomical structure, and unintentional needle or probe movement can hinder the overall effectiveness of RA. The amalgamation of artificial intelligence (AI) to RA practice has promised to override these human limitations. Machine learning, an integral part of AI can improve its performance through continuous learning and experience, like the human brain. It enables computers to recognize images and patterns specifically useful in anatomic structure identification during the performance of RA. AI can provide real-time guidance to clinicians by highlighting important anatomical structures on ultrasound images, and it can also assist in needle tracking and accurate deposition of local anesthetics. The future of RA with AI integration appears promising, yet obstacles such as device malfunction, data privacy, regulatory barriers, and cost concerns can deter its clinical implementation. The current mini review deliberates the current application, future direction, and barrier to the application of AI in RA practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.