Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39600431›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of anaesthesia

Effects of adding intravenous midazolam to a dual postoperative nausea and vomiting regimen in patients undergoing breast surgery: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Kullaporn Mingvoramethakul, Wirinaree Kampitak, Ratikorn Anusorntanawat, Pornarun Charoenraj, Nattaporn Songborassamee, Punyanuch Wongsupha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kullaporn MingvoramethakulDepartment of Anesthesiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society and Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Wirinaree KampitakDepartment of Anesthesiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society and Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ratikorn AnusorntanawatDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chaophrayayommarat Hospital, Suphan Buri, Thailand.
Pornarun CharoenrajDepartment of Anesthesiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society and Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nattaporn SongborassameeDepartment of Anesthesiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society and Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Punyanuch WongsuphaDepartment of Anesthesiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society and Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: For high-risk patients, adding a third antiemetic drug to dual postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prophylaxis is controversial. Given the established antiemetic properties of midazolam, this study compared the combination of low-dose dexamethasone-ondansetron and midazolam with high-dose dexamethasone-ondansetron. Methods: A total of 300 female patients scheduled for breast surgery were recruited and randomly assigned to two groups. The DO group received dexamethasone 8 mg and ondansetron 4 mg, whereas the DOM group received dexamethasone 4 mg, ondansetron 4 mg, and midazolam 0.04 mg/kg. The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV within 24 h. Secondary outcomes were PONV severity, antiemetic requirement, blood glucose levels, satisfaction and sedation scores, time to eye opening and extubation, pain outcome, and sore throat. Results: Primary outcome analysis included 298 patients. Incidence of PONV within the first 24 h after surgery occurred in 52 of 150 (35%) patients in the DO group and 33 of 148 (22%) patients in the DOM group (adjusted risk ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.88; Conclusion: Compared to high-dose dexamethasone and ondansetron alone, midazolam combined with low-dose dexamethasone and ondansetron decreased the incidence of PONV in patients undergoing breast surgery; however, it increased the sedation level in the early postoperative period.

Indexed as

Breastdexamethasonemidazolamnausea and vomitingondansetronpostoperativesurgery

Identifiers

PMID39600431
PMCPMC11587979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.