ArticleBMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies2024
Financial incentives and motivational intervention to improve gastric cancer screening in China: a randomized controlled trial study protocol.
Article in BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) remains a significant global health challenge, with high mortality rates, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, like China. Early detection through screening is crucial for improving prognosis and reducing mortality. However, uptake of GC screening remains suboptimal, highlighting the need for effective interventions to promote screening participation. This study employs an experimental design to evaluate the effectiveness of two interventions, financial incentives and motivational interventions, in promoting GC screening uptake at the individual level. A large sample size will be recruited from high GC-burden provinces in China, and participants will be randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. Statistical analyses, including the χ² test and interrupted time series analysis, will be used to assess the impact of interventions on screening uptake and adherence. The research protocol was reviewed by the ethical review committee of the Peking University Health Science Center (2024097) and registered at the ClinicalTrials.gov. Findings from this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, and engagement with stakeholders to inform evidence-based strategies for improving GC screening and reducing GC-related morbidity and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.