Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39600130›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental science2025

Combining Real-Time Neuroimaging With Machine Learning to Study Attention to Familiar Faces During Infancy: A Proof of Principle Study.

Elena Throm, Anna Gui, Rianne Haartsen, Pedro F da Costa, Robert Leech, Luke Mason, Emily J H Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elena ThromDepartment of Psychological Science, Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8462-5400
Anna GuiDepartment of Psychological Science, Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1108-0774
Rianne HaartsenDepartment of Psychological Science, Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1072-4152
Pedro F da CostaDepartment of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1291-518X
Robert LeechDepartment of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5801-6318
Luke MasonDepartment of Psychological Science, Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.
Emily J H JonesDepartment of Psychological Science, Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5747-9540

Funding

Autism SpeaksAutisticaEuropean CommissionEuropean Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and AssociationsInnovative Medicines InitiativeKing's College LondonNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchUK National Health System Foundation Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Looking at caregivers' faces is important for early social development, and there is a concomitant increase in neural correlates of attention to familiar versus novel faces in the first 6 months. However, by 12 months of age brain responses may not differentiate between familiar and unfamiliar faces. Traditional group-based analyses do not examine whether these 'null' findings stem from a true lack of preference within individual infants, or whether groups of infants show individually strong but heterogeneous preferences for familiar versus unfamiliar faces. In a preregistered proof-of-principle study, we applied Neuroadaptive Bayesian Optimisation (NBO) to test how individual infants' neural responses vary across faces differing in familiarity. Sixty-one 5-12-month-olds viewed faces resulting from gradually morphing a familiar (primary caregiver) into an unfamiliar face. Electroencephalography (EEG) data from fronto-central channels were analysed in real-time. After the presentation of each face, the Negative central (Nc) event-related potential (ERP) amplitude was calculated. A Bayesian Optimisation algorithm iteratively selected the next stimulus until it identified the stimulus eliciting the strongest Nc for that infant. Attrition (15%) was lower than in traditional studies (22%). Although there was no group-level Nc-difference between familiar versus unfamiliar faces, an optimum was predicted in 85% of the children, indicating individual-level attentional preferences. Traditional analyses based on infants' predicted optimum confirmed NBO can identify subgroups based on brain activation. Optima were not related to age and social behaviour. NBO suggests the lack of overall familiar/unfamiliar-face attentional preference in middle infancy is explained by heterogeneous preferences, rather than a lack of preference within individual infants.

Indexed as

AttentionBayes TheoremElectroencephalographyFacial RecognitionMachine LearningBrainEvoked PotentialsFaceFemaleHumansInfantMaleNeuroimagingRecognition, PsychologyEEGinfantmachine learningNeuroadaptive Bayesian Optimisationreal‐time analysissocial attention

Identifiers

PMID39600130
PMCPMC11599787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.