Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39600066›Full record

ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2024

Post-Marketing Safety of Ustekinumab Based on 14-Year Follow-Up in Danish National Patient Data.

Sejun Kim, Andreas Jensen, Alexander Egeberg, Lone Graff Stensballe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sejun KimDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Danish National University Hospital "Rigshospitalet", Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7150-4685
Andreas JensenDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Danish National University Hospital "Rigshospitalet", Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4302-2982
Alexander EgebergDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8257-1816
Lone Graff StensballeDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Danish National University Hospital "Rigshospitalet", Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1569-153X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePsoriasis (PsO), a chronic inflammatory skin disorder affecting a substantial proportion of populations globally, often necessitates systemic treatment including biologics. This 14-year cohort study, based on Danish national register data, aimed to investigate the enduring safety profile of ustekinumab compared to other systemic psoriasis treatments.

methodsUsing comprehensive Danish national register data, this study scrutinized patients diagnosed with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who received ustekinumab. The treatment group comparators were non-biological systemic treatment (non-biologic), tumor necrosis factor α inhibitor medicine groups (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors (IL-17), and IL-23 inhibitors (IL-23). The study periods for comparisons were 2009-2022 for non-biologic and TNF-α, 2015-2022 for IL-17, and 2018-2022 for IL-23. Outcomes were malignancies, cardiovascular events, serious infections, and serious hypersensitivity reactions. Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to analyze two estimands: a standard intention-to-treat (ITT) estimand and a continuous-index-treatment (CIT) estimand, which considered switch and re-initiation of treatments within individuals.

resultsUsers of ustekinumab were found to be younger on average, with an average age of 45.1 years compared to 51.6, 47.2, 49.0, and 48.4 years in the non-biologic, TNF-α, IL-17, and IL-23 groups, respectively. Also, 57.3% of the ustekinumab users were male, compared to 46.7%, 48.9%, 50.9%, and 58.3% for the non-biologic, TNF-α, IL-17, and IL-23 groups, respectively. Although the hazard ratio estimates varied across comparators, ustekinumab was found to be safe: regardless of PsA status, no discernible safety signals in terms of malignancy, MACE, severe infections, or severe hypersensitivity reactions were observed for ustekinumab when compared to the treatment comparators.

conclusionsThe present study corroborated the enduring safety of ustekinumab in the context of PsO treatment.

Indexed as

Product Surveillance, PostmarketingPsoriasisUstekinumabAdultAgedArthritis, PsoriaticCohort StudiesDenmarkDermatologic AgentsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInterleukin-23MaleMiddle AgedRegistriesDermatologic AgentsInterleukin-23Tumor Necrosis Factor-alphaUstekinumabdrug safetyestimandMACEmalignanciespsoriasisregister‐based studyustekinumab

Identifiers

PMID39600066
PMCPMC11599636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.